首页> 外文学位 >Wanting the bad and doing the bad things: An essay in moral psychology.
【24h】

Wanting the bad and doing the bad things: An essay in moral psychology.

机译:想要坏事和做坏事:道德心理学论文。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In this dissertation, I argue that it is possible to desire what is believed to be bad and not at all good, to intentionally pursue what is believed to be bad and not at all good, and that the believed badness of an action can be an agent's reason for acting. I refer to these theses as the desirebad, intentionbad, and reasonbad theses, respectively.; I consider various accounts of desire and I argue that all but one is consistent with the desirebad thesis. The account that is inconsistent, what I call the Thomist account, implies that believing that the object of desire is good is necessary for desiring it. However, the Thomist account depends on dubious assumptions about the nature of desire and what it is to act intelligibly. I also consider various accounts of intention and I argue that the intentionbad thesis is consistent with all of them, including accounts that identify intentions with a kind of evaluation and the outcome of a kind of decision.; I then consider objections to my three theses. For example, it is plausible to suppose that intentional action is performed for reasons, but it seems that the intentional pursuit of the bad cannot be action performed for reasons. This objection fails because it fails to distinguish different kinds of reasons; in particular, it fails to distinguish normative reasons and an agent's reason for acting. Here is another objection. Some philosophers claim that agents who intentionally pursue the bad cannot be in control of or understand themselves and what they do. I consider various ways that agents can possess control and understanding; for example, by having goals and performing goal-directed behavior, by deliberately forming and executing intentions, and by treating considerations as reasons. I argue that at least some agents who intentionally pursue the bad possess control and understanding, just as agents who act intentionally do.; In responding to these objections, I develop a positive account of intentional action and agency that is inclusive enough to explain non-standard agents and their actions.
机译:在这篇论文中,我认为有可能希望被认为是坏的而不是根本没有好处的东西,有意追求被认为是坏的而不是根本没有好处的事情,并且行为的被认为是坏处可能是代理采取行动的理由。我将这些论点分别称为欲望论,意图论和推理论。我考虑了对欲望的各种解释,我认为除一个之外的所有观点都与欲望的命题是一致的。不一致的叙述,即我所说的“汤姆斯主义”叙述,意味着相信欲望的对象是好的,这对于渴望它是必要的。然而,托马斯主义的解释依赖于关于欲望的性质及其明智行动的可疑假设。我还考虑了各种意图说明,并认为意图不良论点与所有意图说明都是一致的,包括用一种评估和一种决定的结果来识别意图的说明。然后,我考虑反对我的三个论点。例如,假设出于某种原因执行了故意的动作是合理的,但似乎无法出于某种原因而故意执行对坏人的追求。该异议之所以失败,是因为它无法区分各种原因。特别是,它无法区分规范性原因和代理人的行为原因。这是另一个异议。一些哲学家声称,故意追求坏事的代理人无法控制或了解自己以及他们的所作所为。我考虑了代理可以控制和理解的各种方式。例如,通过具有目标并执行目标导向的行为,通过故意形成和执行意图,以及将考虑因素视为理由来实现。我认为,至少像那些故意行事的代理商一样,一些故意追求坏事的代理商拥有控制和谅解。在回应这些反对意见时,我对故意行为和代理进行了积极的阐述,该涵义足以解释非标准代理人及其行为。

著录项

  • 作者

    Barry, Peter Brian.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Florida.;

  • 授予单位 University of Florida.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.; Psychology General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码 200 p.
  • 总页数 200
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论;心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号