首页> 外文学位 >Pathways to civil war: A study of multiple paths toward civil war.
【24h】

Pathways to civil war: A study of multiple paths toward civil war.

机译:内战的途径:研究内战的多种途径。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation is about conflict escalation to civil war, and examines why some political confrontations escalate and why principal conflict actors continue fighting rather than reaching a number of political arrangements at various points of the course of conflict. Unlike previous studies, this study treats the progression to civil war as one of complex alternate paths. In so doing, building on the perspective of asymmetric information (i.e. uncertainty) problems as a cause of war, this study claims that involving each conflict actor's cognitive variances about its opponent's willingness to resolve and military strength would bolster either side's costly military mobilization and boil over into civil war. Four extant hypotheses on conflict escalation and two specific propositions from a two-sided uncertainty perspective are tested with ordered and binary multiple logistic regression analyses against state-year aggregated data on government repression and armed resistance levels as well as civil war onset from 1976 to 2000. A comparative case illustration of the Lebanese civil war of 1975--1976 and the Northern Ireland conflict of 1970--1998 further illuminates the internal conflict dynamics toward or away from civil war, examining the emergence of principal and secondary armed actors in the course of conflict. Both the quantitative and qualitative studies provide evidence for the roles of uncertainty in either government leaders' or armed rebel leaders' decisions to fight or make certain concessions, while demonstrating that structural, institutional, demographic, and insurgent-favorable factors help explain the causes and persistence of 'initial' communal violence, armed resistance, and government repression. The study concludes with substantive policy implications for preventing conflict escalation and calls for stepping up efforts at establishing actor-based theoretical underpinnings to understand civil war as multi-interdependent reciprocal processes.
机译:本文是关于冲突升级为内战的,并探讨了为什么某些政治对抗升级,为什么主要冲突参与者继续战斗,而不是在冲突过程的各个阶段达成许多政治安排。与以前的研究不同,本研究将内战的进展视为复杂的替代途径之一。在此过程中,以不对称信息(即不确定性)问题为战争根源的观点为基础,这项研究声称,涉及每个冲突参与者关于其对手解决意愿和军事实力的认知差异,将助长双方昂贵的军事动员和煮沸结束内战。利用有序和二进制多元逻辑回归分析测试了关于冲突升级的四个现存假设和两个特定命题,并针对1976年至2000年各州年度有关政府镇压和武装抵抗水平以及内战爆发的汇总数据进行了检验。对1975--1976年的黎巴嫩内战和1970--1998年的北爱尔兰冲突的比较案例说明,进一步阐明了朝着或远离内战的内部冲突动态,考察了主要和次要武装分子在此过程中的出现冲突。定量和定性研究都为不确定性在政府领导人或武装叛乱领导人抗击或做出某些让步的决定中的作用提供了证据,同时证明了结构,制度,人口和叛乱有利因素有助于解释原因和原因。持续存在“初始”社区暴力,武装抵抗和政府镇压。该研究以防止冲突升级的实质性政策含义作为结束,并呼吁加紧努力,建立基于行为者的理论基础,以将内战理解为相互依赖的多方对等过程。

著录项

  • 作者

    Suzuki, Susumu.;

  • 作者单位

    Wayne State University.;

  • 授予单位 Wayne State University.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.;Political Science International Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 317 p.
  • 总页数 317
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号