首页> 外文学位 >Explicit and implicit stigma of mental illness in mental healthcare settings.
【24h】

Explicit and implicit stigma of mental illness in mental healthcare settings.

机译:在精神卫生保健机构中显性和隐性的精神病耻辱。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Understanding the nature of stigma in clinical care settings is of principal importance for both patients and employees alike. This study explored explicit and implicit attitudes toward mental illness among psychiatric inpatient facility employees (N = 72) who work directly and regularly with the severely mentally ill. Implicit biases were measured via a version of the Implicit Association Test (IAT), and explicit biases toward mental illness were measured via the Perceived Dangerousness of Mental Patients scale (PDMP) and two questions that had participants rate their attitudes toward persons with mental illness and persons with physical illness via a Likert scale. Implicit bias against persons with mental illness was evident in the association of mental illness with dangerous, but was not evident in the association of mental illness with bad (though there was a trend in this instance also). Results also revealed significant group differences, as nurses, compared to mental health professionals, exhibited stronger implicit associations of mental illness with dangerous and mental illness with bad. This finding may be due to the nature of nurse-patient interactions, as nurses sometimes deal with more difficult and demanding circumstances than other mental health professionals (it is not believed that nurses are more intrinsically biased people). As expected, participants did not exhibit explicit biases against persons with mental illness. Counter to a priori hypotheses, correlations revealed no significant relationships between implicit stigma and measures of patient contact, a finding that may be explained by unmet conditions of the Contact Hypothesis. As expected, explicit and implicit attitudes were found to be unrelated to each other, suggesting they represent different constructs. Explicit measures were not interrelated, but implicit measures were significantly correlated with each other. The general presence of implicit stigma is testament to the prevailing negative social messages about mental illness. Society's pervasive stigmatizing of mental illness continues to make it a marginalized condition, and the problem is not resolved.
机译:对于患者和员工而言,了解临床护理环境中污名的本质都是至关重要的。这项研究探讨了直接和定期与严重精神疾病患者一起工作的精神病住院机构员工(N = 72)对精神疾病的显式和隐性态度。内隐偏见通过内隐联想测验(IAT)进行衡量,对精神疾病的外显偏见通过对精神病患者的感知危险量表(PDMP)进行衡量,还有两个问题让参与者对他们对精神疾病患者的态度进行了评分。患有李克特量表的身体疾病患者。在精神病与危险的关联中,对精神病患者的隐性偏见是显而易见的,但在精神病与不良的关联中却没有明显的偏见(尽管在这种情况下也有趋势)。结果还显示出显着的群体差异,因为与心理健康专业人员相比,护士表现出更强的内隐性心理疾病与危险心理疾病以及不良心理疾病的关联。这一发现可能是由于护士与医患互动的性质所致,因为护士有时会比其他心理健康专业人员处理更困难和更苛刻的情况(不认为护士在本质上有偏见)。不出所料,参与者对精神疾病患者没有明显的偏见。与先验假设相反,相关性表明隐性柱头与患者接触度量之间没有显着关系,这一发现可能由接触假设的未满足条件所解释。正如预期的那样,发现显性和隐性态度彼此无关,表明它们代表不同的构想。显式度量不相互关联,但隐性度量彼此显着相关。隐性污名的普遍存在证明了关于精神疾病的普遍负面社会信息。社会对精神疾病的普遍侮辱继续使它成为边缘化疾病,这个问题没有得到解决。

著录项

  • 作者

    Gershan, David Nathan.;

  • 作者单位

    Virginia Consortium for Professional Psychology (Old Dominion University).;

  • 授予单位 Virginia Consortium for Professional Psychology (Old Dominion University).;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Mental Health.;Psychology Clinical.;Psychology Social.
  • 学位 Psy.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 78 p.
  • 总页数 78
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号