首页> 外文学位 >Evaluating the validity of accommodations for English learners through evidence based on response processes.
【24h】

Evaluating the validity of accommodations for English learners through evidence based on response processes.

机译:通过基于响应过程的证据评估英语学习者适应性的有效性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

English learners (ELs) represent one of the fastest growing student populations in the United States. Given that language can serve as a barrier in EL performance, test accommodations are provided to help level the playing field and allow ELs to better demonstrate their true performance level. Test accommodations on the computer offer the ability to collect new types of data difficult to obtain via paper-and-pencil tests. Specifically, these data can be used as additional sources of validity evidence when examining test accommodations. To date, limited research has examined computer-based accommodations, thus limiting these additional sources of validity evidence. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of computer-based test accommodations on high school History and Math assessments using evidence based on response processes, specifically accommodation use and response time. Two direct linguistic accommodations, non-ELs, two EL groups, and five research questions were investigated in this study.;Accommodation use results indicated significant differences in use across the three student groups, with ELs using accommodations more frequently than non-ELs. However, there were still high percentages of all three groups not accessing any accommodations on individual items. Accommodation use was more common on History than on Math, and decreased as the assessment progressed. Results suggest future research focus on students actually using the accommodations when conducting research on the effectiveness of accommodations.;Response time results showed ELs taking longer to process test items as compared to non-ELs regardless of receiving test accommodations. Receiving accommodations significantly impacted processing time for some of the items on History, but not on Math. Similarly, History showed a relationship between the number of accommodations on test items and response time, but Math did not. These results suggested that the Math content knowledge may have played a larger role in response time than the accommodations. Positive relationships between test performance and response time were found in both subject areas. The most common predictors of both accommodation use and response time across both subject areas were sex, Hispanic status, and socioeconomic status. Implications of the results and suggestions for future research are discussed.
机译:英语学习者(EL)代表美国增长最快的学生群体之一。鉴于语言可能会成为EL性能的障碍,因此提供了测试工具以帮助公平竞争,并使EL更好地展示其真实性能水平。计算机上的测试工具可以收集很难通过纸笔测试获得的新型数据。具体而言,在检查测试条件时,这些数据可用作有效性证据的其他来源。迄今为止,有限的研究已经检查了基于计算机的适应性,因此限制了这些额外的有效性证据来源。这项研究的目的是使用基于响应过程的证据,特别是根据住宿条件的使用和响应时间,评估高中历史和数学评估中基于计算机的考试条件的有效性。在这项研究中,调查了两个直接的语言适应,非英语语言能力,两个英语语言群体和五个研究问题。;住宿使用的结果表明,在三个学生群体中使用语言的显着不同,英语语言学习者比非英语语言者更频繁地使用语言适应。但是,在所有三个组中仍然有很高的比例无法访问单个项目的任何住宿。在历史上,住宿使用比数学上更普遍,并且随着评估的进行而减少。结果表明未来的研究将重点放在在对住宿的有效性进行研究时实际使用住宿的学生上。响应时间结果显示,与接受非住宿的EL相比,EL处理时间要长于非EL。接收适应性会极大地影响“历史记录”中某些项目的处理时间,但不会影响“数学”中的某些项目。同样,历史记录显示了测试项目的容纳次数与响应时间之间的关系,而数学却没有。这些结果表明,数学内容知识在响应时间中的作用可能比调节方法更大。在两个主题领域都发现测试性能和响应时间之间存在正相关关系。在两个主题领域中,住宿使用和反应时间的最常见预测因素是性别,西班牙裔身份和社会经济状况。讨论了结果的含义和对未来研究的建议。

著录项

  • 作者

    Crotts, Katrina M.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Educational tests measurements.;English as a second language.
  • 学位 Ed.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 170 p.
  • 总页数 170
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号