首页> 外文学位 >Interstitial Religion: Approaches to the Study of Religion on the Middle Ground.
【24h】

Interstitial Religion: Approaches to the Study of Religion on the Middle Ground.

机译:间隙宗教:中间立场宗教研究的方法。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Social science research in religion seems to be losing sight of the middle ground where institutions and individuals interact and thus struggles to offer a constructive response to the dilemmas facing scholars of religion more generally. In response, this dissertation aims to bolster the efforts of those calling for an examination of the connections between lived religion and institutional fields. Viewing religion as a field or network visible through the interaction of individuals and institutions within it makes clear the object of social research and indicates a reflexive method for ethnographic research. Specifically, it is proposed that: (a) religion in general is a discursive field or network of communication and communicative action, definable only within its specific situation; (b) a "religion" in particular is a set of cohesive segmentary social networks characterized by discourse and communicative action in service of whatever is situationally defined as religious (most typically involving motivations and purposes commonly apprehended as related to the ultimate conditions of human existence); (c) lived religion, therefore, is empirically visible to the scholar solely through language and behavior by agents acting within those social networks; and (d) because of his or her active role in perceiving and interacting with and within the social networks that structure religious fields, the empirical scholar inherently and inevitably is a part of the field itself, which simply cannot exist without the relationship between the researcher and the object of study. These claims are illustrated with case studies using a variety of empirical methods; many underlying concerns remain the same regardless of how a particular situation is examined. Two cases (Japanese mizuko kuyo rituals and the True Love Waits chastity campaign) are based on analysis of primary and secondary sources, three others in ethnographic field research (Jews in postsocialist Slovakia, a "Generation X" church, and a Jewish seeker service), and one case (the Jewish emergent phenomenon) in a combination. The cases illustrate how to define and study religion empirically when it seems to be visible primarily in the interstitial middle ground where people articulate their sense of self and negotiate their relationships with one another.
机译:宗教方面的社会科学研究似乎没有看到机构和个人互动的中间地带,因此很难为宗教学者所面临的困境提供建设性的回应。作为回应,本论文旨在加强那些要求研究生活宗教与制度领域之间联系的人们的努力。将宗教视为通过个人和机构之间的互动而可见的领域或网络,可以明确社会研究的对象,并为民族志研究提供了一种反身的方法。具体而言,建议:(a)宗教一般是仅在其特定情况下可定义的交流和交流行动的话语领域或网络; (b)“宗教”尤其是一组凝聚性的细分社会网络,其特征是通过话语和交际行动来服务于任何情况下定义为宗教的活动(最通常涉及与人类生存的最终条件有关的动机和目的) ); (c)因此,仅通过在这些社交网络中行动的代理人的语言和行为,学者就可以从经验上看到生活的宗教; (d)由于经验丰富的学者在感知和构成宗教领域的社会网络中以及与之互动方面所起的积极作用,因此经验学者固有地且不可避免地是该领域本身的一部分,没有研究者之间的关系就不可能存在和研究对象。这些索赔通过使用各种经验方法的案例研究得到说明。无论如何检查特定情况,许多潜在的问题都保持不变。两起案件(日本水izu酷祭仪式和“真爱等待贞操”运动)基于对主要和次要来源的分析,另外三起发生在民族志领域研究中(后社会主义斯洛伐克的犹太人,“ X代”教堂和寻求犹太人的服务) ,以及一种情况(犹太人出现的现象)组合在一起。这些案例说明了当人们似乎主要在间隙中间地带看到宗教时,人们如何通过经验来界定和研究宗教,在中间地带人们表达自己的自我意识并彼此协商关系。

著录项

  • 作者

    Landres, Jonathan Shawn.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Santa Barbara.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Santa Barbara.;
  • 学科 Religion General.;Anthropology Cultural.;Sociology Theory and Methods.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 307 p.
  • 总页数 307
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号