首页> 外文学位 >Yonghegong: Imperial universalism and the art and architecture of Beijing's 'Lama Temple'.
【24h】

Yonghegong: Imperial universalism and the art and architecture of Beijing's 'Lama Temple'.

机译:雍和宫:帝国普世主义与北京“喇嘛庙”的艺术和建筑。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Yonghegong ("Palace of Harmony and Peace"), popularly known in English as the "Lama Temple," is often described as Beijing's largest and most important Tibetan Buddhist monastery, but from its establishment in 1694 during the Qing dynasty (1644-1911) to the present, Yonghegong has continued to evolve physically and functionally, from imperial prince's residence, to "travelling palace" (xinggong), to imperial ancestral shrine and Tibetan Buddhist monastic college, and finally to its current role as monastery, monastic college and museum. Despite its history and ubiquity as a Beijing landmark and destination for pilgrims and tourists, it has received limited academic attention. Furthermore, previous studies have emphasized the site as a Tibetan Buddhist monastery, downplaying its political significance. This study will provide a more comprehensive interpretation of Yonghegong as an expression of the Qing ideology of imperial universalism, focusing on the site during the reign of its major patron, the Qianlong emperor (r. 1735-1796).;In order both to describe and interpret the multidimensional complexities of Yonghegong in a systematic fashion, I will employ as a heuristic device an interpretive model for the site inspired by two aspects the Indo-Tibetan tradition of the mandala: symbolic mapping and spatial ordering. The many symbols at the site will be arranged according to what I call the "three spheres" that center on the person of the Qianlong emperor: microcosm, the somatic sphere (symbols of the emperor's presence and personal history at the site); mesocosm, the socio-politcal sphere (multicultural symbols of the emperor's legitimacy); and finally macrocosm, the eschatological sphere (symbols of the emperor's role as enlightened ruler, ushering in the coming of the next buddha, Maitreya). Interpretation of the three spheres at Yonghegong is then applied first to the site's external features (e.g. site plan, architecture, what I call the "outer mandala") and then to examples of the internal features (e.g. sculptures, inscriptions, what I call the "inner mandala"). This study will both contextualize much of the overlooked symbolism of the Qianlong-era art and architecture at Yonghegong, as well as provide the first comprehensive interpretation of the site as a whole.
机译:雍和宫(“和谐与和平宫”)在英语中俗称“喇嘛庙”,通常被称为北京最大,最重要的藏传佛教寺院,但始建于1694年清朝(1644-1911年)到现在,雍和宫的身体和功能一直在不断发展,从皇太子的住所到“行宫”,再到祖传神宫和藏传佛教寺院,最后发展到现在的修道院,寺院和博物馆。尽管它是北京朝圣者和游客的地标和目的地,历史悠久且无处不在,但它在学术上的关注有限。此外,先前的研究强调该遗址为藏传佛教寺院,对它的政治意义轻描淡写。这项研究将对雍和宫作为清帝国帝国主义普遍思想的一种表达方式进行更全面的解释,着重于其主要赞助人乾隆皇帝(1735-1796年)统治时期的遗址。并以系统的方式解释雍和宫的多维复杂性,我将采用一种启发式的装置,作为曼陀罗的印度-西藏传统的两个方面的启发而建立的解释模型:符号映射和空间排序。站点上的许多符号将按照我称为乾隆皇帝的人物的“三个范围”进行排列:缩影,体域(皇帝在场和个人历史的符号);中观世界,社会政治领域(皇帝合法性的多元文化象征);最后是宏观世界,即末世论领域(皇帝作为开明统治者的角色的象征,标志着下一个菩萨弥勒的到来)。然后,首先对永和宫的三个领域进行解释,将其应用于遗址的外部特征(例如,场地平面图,建筑,我称之为“外部曼陀罗”),然后再应用于内部特征的示例(例如,雕塑,铭文,我称为“曼陀罗”)。 “内曼陀罗”)。这项研究不仅将永和宫的乾隆时代的许多艺术和建筑象征意义进行了情境化,而且还将对整个遗址进行首次全面的解释。

著录项

  • 作者

    Greenwood, Kevin R. E.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kansas.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kansas.;
  • 学科 Religion History of.;Art History.;History Asia Australia and Oceania.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 469 p.
  • 总页数 469
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:38

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号