首页> 外文学位 >Heidegger and Gadamer on finitude, truth, and objectivity.
【24h】

Heidegger and Gadamer on finitude, truth, and objectivity.

机译:海德格尔和加达默尔在有限性,真实性和客观性上。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The natures of objectivity and truth are perennial issues in philosophy. This dissertation examines the concepts of objectivity and truth worked out by Martin Heidegger and Hans-Georg Gadamer, both of whom insisted that these concepts must be understood on the basis of human finitude. Understood in this manner, objectivity and truth are revised in ways that at once challenge the traditional philosophical understanding of these concepts, especially as these have taken shape in the modern period, and reorient our conception of thinking and inquiry. The concept of finitude itself, however, is interpreted in a more radical way by Heidegger and Gadamer than the tradition itself has recognized. Finitude for them is marked not by mere limitations in the "faculties" of perception, cognition, and knowing, but by the thrownness of human being into an always already given historical context of meaning.;I examine first both Heidegger's and Gadamer's critiques of the traditional philosophical conceptions of objectivity and truth. In general, their criticisms are directed toward some unexamined assumptions about human nature and the relation between human understanding and the world in which we exist. Next I outline and explain the theories of human finitude held by Heidegger and by Gadamer. Following this I discuss the positive conceptions of objectivity and truth by which Heidegger and Gadamer intend to replace the traditional conceptions. Both thinkers provide us with a treatment of the nature of theory of a hermeneutic truth that underlies and sustains correspondence truth, but neither offers an explicit positive theory of objectivity. Part of my task here is to provide one, based on readings of key texts, that I believe they would endorse. I conclude by arguing that overall the philosophy of Gadamer, because of its emphasis on dialogue and its avoidance of the later Heidegger's pessimism, gives us the best alternatives to the traditional philosophical theories of objectivity and truth.;Keywords. Truth, Objectivity, Hermeneutics, Heidegger, Gadamer.
机译:客观性和真理的本质是哲学中的常年问题。本文考察了马丁·海德格尔和汉斯·乔治·加达默尔提出的客观性和真理性概念,他们都认为必须根据人类有限性来理解这些概念。以这种方式理解后,客观性和真理的修改方式立即挑战了对这些概念的传统哲学理解,尤其是当这些概念在近代形成时,并重新定位了我们的思维和探究概念。但是,海德格尔和伽达默尔以一种更为激进的方式来解释有限性这一概念本身,而不是传统本身所公认的。他们的有限性不仅标志着认知,认知和知识的“局限性”,而且还在于人类对一个已经完全给定的历史意义的抛弃。我首先考察海德格尔和伽达默尔对哲学的批判。客观性和真理的传统哲学观念。总的来说,他们的批评是针对一些未经审查的关于人性以及人类理解与我们所生活的世界之间关系的假设。接下来,我概述和解释海德格尔和伽达默尔关于人类有限性的理论。在此之后,我讨论了客观性和真理性的积极观念,海德格尔和加达默尔打算用这些观念来代替传统观念。两位思想家都为我们提供了解释学真理理论本质的解释,该诠释真理理论是基础并支持对应真理,但都没有提供明确的积极客观理论。我在这里的部分任务是根据关键文本的阅读提供一个,我相信它们会得到认可。最后,我争论说,伽达默尔哲学的整体,因为它强调对话并且避免了后来的海德格尔的悲观主义,为我们提供了替代客观性和真理的传统哲学理论的最佳选择。真理,客观性,诠释学,海德格尔,伽达默尔。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mulberry, Greig Robert.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Kentucky.;

  • 授予单位 University of Kentucky.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 223 p.
  • 总页数 223
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:41:13

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号