首页> 外文学位 >What gives? Anxiety, truth and finitude in Heidegger's 'Being and Time'.
【24h】

What gives? Anxiety, truth and finitude in Heidegger's 'Being and Time'.

机译:是什么赋予了?海德格尔《存在与时间》中的焦虑,真理与有限。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I focus on the relationship between anxiety and truth in Heidegger's Being and Time to explain the relation of humans to Being that challenges the distinction upheld in the current scholarship on Heidegger between his early and later thinking. I conclude that rather than overcoming metaphysics, as Heidegger claims to do throughout his writings beginning with Being and Time, Heidegger's thinking of the relation between the human (Da-sein) and Being places him within what I call the Western tradition of the metaphysics of feeling. As early as in Being and Time and throughout much of his life Heidegger struggled over his inability to explain the relationship between Da-sein and Being. The division between the early and later Heidegger, or Heidegger I and II, revolves around the understanding of this relationship. The early Heidegger of Being and Time is generally interpreted as putting forward a philosophy of existence wherein Da-sein is understood as an isolated egoistic, individual that has become authentic in the taking up of its life as its own and as finite. Heidegger I places the emphasis on the individual. In the later Heidegger Being plays the central role. Being gives to Da-sein its existence and Da-sein as a recipient of what Being gives gets relegated to role of shepherd, or caretaker of Being. Finitude belongs to Being. I argue that in Being and Time the relationship established between anxiety and truth works to clear Da-sein of any sense of individuality and places Da-sein in a direct relation to Being, or truth. On the basis of this relation the individuality of Da-sein is born in and as a process that defines its finitude. By focusing on anxiety and truth I not only put forward an explanation of the relation between Da-sein and Being, but I show how the certainty of this relation is grounded on the pre-rational level of anxiety. Grounding certainty in anxiety by "yoking" anxiety to truth is why I place Heidegger within the metaphysics of feeling. It is on the level of anxiety that humans must be in accord to live in the same world.
机译:我将重点放在海德格尔的《存在与时间》中的焦虑与真理之间的关系上,以解释人类与存在之间的关系,这种关系挑战了海德格尔在当前学术界所坚持的早晚思想之间的区别。我得出的结论是,海德格尔不但没有克服形而上学,而是像海德格尔自始至终声称存在那样,在他的所有著作中都做到了这一点,但他对人(大圣)与存在之间关系的思考却将他置于我所谓的西方形而上学传统之中。感觉。早在《存在与时间》一生中,海德格尔就因无法解释大圣与存在之间的关系而苦苦挣扎。早期和晚期海德格尔,即海德格尔一世和二世之间的分歧,围绕着对这种关系的理解。早期的存在与时间的海德格尔通常被解释为提出一种生存哲学,其中大神被理解为一个孤立的利己主义个体,在将其生命当作自己的生命和有限的事情上已经成为真实的。海德格尔一世强调个人。在后来的海德格尔作为中心。存在给予大圣的存在,而大圣作为存在给予者的接受者则沦为牧羊人或看守的角色。有限属于存在。我认为,在存在与时间之间,焦虑与真理之间建立的关系可以使大仙清除任何个性感,并使大仙与存在或真理直接相关。在这种关系的基础上,大神的个性诞生于这一过程中,并定义了其有限性。通过关注焦虑和真理,我不仅提出了大仙与存在之间的关系的解释,而且还表明了这种关系的确定性是如何基于理性的焦虑之前的。我通过将海德格尔置于感觉的形而上学,为什么通过将“对现实的焦虑”“加”为焦虑来确定确定性。人类必须和谐一致地生活在同一个世界上。

著录项

  • 作者

    Elkholy, Sharin N.;

  • 作者单位

    New School University.;

  • 授予单位 New School University.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2003
  • 页码 199 p.
  • 总页数 199
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:45:57

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号