首页> 外文学位 >Two essays on managerial discretion in pension accounting under SFAS 87.
【24h】

Two essays on managerial discretion in pension accounting under SFAS 87.

机译:SFAS 87下有关养老金会计管理自由裁量权的两篇文章。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Pension accounting has received considerable attention recently from the popular press and accounting regulators, and much of this attention has focused on whether managers use discretion in pension accounting and funding to opportunistically manage reported earnings. These concerns culminated when the SEC announced its investigation into firms' pension accounting practices in October 2004. Concurrent with these concerns are calls from accounting academics to focus earnings management studies on specific accruals in order to understand exactly how managers manipulate earnings and whether this type of manipulation affects resource allocation.;This dissertation addresses both the concerns of the popular press and accounting regulators and the call from accounting academics and investigates pension accounting as an earnings management tool. Specifically, this dissertation is composed of two studies that examine the effects of managerial discretion and pension accounting. The first study investigates whether managers use the discretion afforded them under SFAS 87 to meet earnings targets. The second study explores whether investors and analysts "see through" the discretion exercised by managers under SFAS 87.;In Study 1, I find evidence consistent with the notion that managers make aggressive discount rate assumptions that increase the likelihood that the firm's annual earnings will meet analysts' forecasts. In addition, I find that the reduction in pension expense that results when managers make larger than expected contributions to their pension funds also significantly increases the likelihood of meeting analysts' forecasts.;In Study 2, I investigate whether investors are misled by the pension-related earnings management documented in Study 1 by investigating whether there are predictable patterns in returns related to the extent of managed pension cost. The results of the tests performed in Study 2 indicate that there appears to be no detectable mispricing associated with my empirical proxies for the managed components of pension cost. These findings corroborate prior evidence regarding the market's efficiency with respect to pension accounting information. I conclude that while managers use the discretion afforded them under pension accounting to help them meet the analyst forecast, investors do not appear to be misled by this discretion.
机译:养老金会计最近受到了流行的新闻和会计监管机构的相当大的关注,而这些关注的大部分集中在管理者是否在养老金会计和资金中运用判断力来机会主义地管理报告的收益。当美国证券交易委员会(SEC)在2004年10月宣布对公司的养老金会计惯例进行调查时,这些担忧最终达到了顶峰。与此同时,会计学者呼吁将收益管理研究重点放在特定的应计项目上,以便准确了解经理如何操纵收益以及这种类型的收益。操纵会影响资源的分配。具体而言,本论文由两项研究组成,研究了管理自由裁量权和养老金会计的影响。第一项研究调查了管理者是否使用SFAS 87规定的酌处权来实现收入目标。第二项研究探讨了投资者和分析师是否根据SFAS 87行使了经理人的自由裁量权;在研究1中,我发现证据与以下观点相一致:经理人做出了积极的折现率假设,从而增加了公司年收益将发生的可能性。达到分析师的预测。此外,我发现,当管理人员向其养老基金缴纳的款项超过预期时,所导致的养老金费用减少也大大增加了达到分析师预期的可能性。在研究2中,我调查了投资者是否被养老金误导了-通过调查是否存在与可管理养老金成本范围相关的收益率可预测模式,在研究1中记录了相关的收益管理。研究2中进行的测试结果表明,对于养老金成本的可管理部分,似乎没有与我的经验代理相关的可测错定价。这些发现证实了有关养老金会计信息市场效率的先前证据。我得出的结论是,尽管经理人使用养老金会计法赋予他们的酌处权来帮助他们达到分析师的预测,但投资者似乎并不会因此而受到误导。

著录项

  • 作者

    Moore, Erin A.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Massachusetts Amherst.;

  • 授予单位 University of Massachusetts Amherst.;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 127 p.
  • 总页数 127
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号