首页> 外文学位 >The public -private city: Automobile parking and the control of urban space in San Francisco, 1920--1959.
【24h】

The public -private city: Automobile parking and the control of urban space in San Francisco, 1920--1959.

机译:公共-私人城市:1920--1959年,旧金山的停车场和城市空间控制。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines the influence of automobile parking on urban space, municipal government, and downtown businesses in San Francisco, California between 1920 and 1959. Though racial conflicts and de-industrialization are usually blamed for the twentieth-century "urban crisis," contemporary reports from municipalities, businesses, the popular press, and newspapers were preoccupied with another emergency: the competition of too many drivers for too few parking spaces. Curbs could never park enough cars, nor could private firms supply convenient off-street parking cheaply enough for drivers. Downtown retailers feared parking difficulties would deter their best customers, especially affluent women drivers, while municipalities feared losing essential taxes on downtown property.;"The Public-Private City" traces San Francisco's parking problem through four decades. During the 1920s, little action followed the first widespread concerns about downtown parking, which only worsened when motorists ignored unenforceable parking rules. Between 1937 and 1941, after two new bridges increased the influx of drivers, the city banned curb parking, towed illegally-parked cars, and considered installing parking meters. While drivers and businessmen successfully resisted these measures, a privately-financed garage under a retail-district public park demonstrated a public-private solution to downtown's problem. When postwar suburbanization offered alternatives to worsening downtown parking, officials planned huge garages to simultaneously bolster downtown and demolish "blighted" neighborhoods that were draining city finances. Business groups led municipal garage efforts and endorsed curb regulations they earlier opposed. City voters approved a 1947 off-street parking bond; two years later, California gave San Francisco's new Parking Authority eminent domain powers. By the 1950s, the city was seizing sites for garages to be financed, built, and operated by private interests.;My dissertation reveals how intercity competition led municipalities to become business-like entities intent on maximizing revenues. Both parking regulations and municipal parking garages generated city income while benefiting affluent drivers, sometimes at the expense of the city's poorest citizens. Finally, public-private parking illustrates the early use of eminent domain to forcibly transfer land from one private owner to another, re-affirmed in 2005 by the Supreme Court's widely-criticized ruling in Kelo v. New London, Connecticut.
机译:本文研究了1920年至1959年间,停车场对加利福尼亚州旧金山市的城市空间,市政府和市中心企业的影响。尽管种族冲突和去工业化通常被归咎于20世纪的“城市危机”,但当代报道来自市政当局,企业,大众媒体和报纸的消息引起了另一个紧急情况:过多的驾驶员争夺停车位。路边永远不能停放足够的汽车,私人公司也不能以足够便宜的价格为驾驶员提供方便的路边停车。市区零售商担心停车困难会阻止他们的最佳顾客,特别是富裕的女司机,而市政当局则担心失去市区财产的基本税。“公共-私人城市”追溯了旧金山长达40年的停车问题。在1920年代,人们对​​市区停车的最初广泛关注几乎没有采取任何行动,只有当驾车人忽略了无法执行的停车规定时,这种情况才恶化。在1937年和1941年之间,两座新桥增加了驾驶员的涌入之后,该市禁止路边停车,拖走非法停放的汽车,并考虑安装停车收费表。尽管驾驶员和商人成功地抵制了这些措施,但零售区公园下的一个私人车库证明了解决市中心问题的公私合营方案。战后郊区化为解决市区停车问题提供了替代方案时,官员们计划修建大型车库,以同时支撑市区和拆除使城市财务陷入困境的“枯萎”街区。商业团体领导了市政车库的工作,并通过了他们先前反对的路边法规。城市选民批准了1947年的路边停车保证金;两年后,加利福尼亚赋予了旧金山新的停车管理局显着的领域权力。到1950年代,该市已占领了由私人利益筹集,建造和运营的车库的地盘。我的论文揭示了城市间的竞争如何导致市政当局成为旨在使收入最大化的商业实体。停车规定和市政停车库均产生了城市收入,同时又使富裕的驾驶员受益,有时却以牺牲城市最贫困的公民为代价。最后,公私两用的停车场说明了早期使用显着性地域将土地从一个私人所有者强行转让给另一私人所有者的做法,2005年,最高法院在康涅狄格州的Kelo诉New London案中广受批评的裁决再次确认了这一点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Klocko, Eric Gregory.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 History United States.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 371 p.
  • 总页数 371
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号