首页> 外文学位 >Job engagement: Construct validation and relationships with job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation.
【24h】

Job engagement: Construct validation and relationships with job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation.

机译:工作投入:与工作满意度,工作参与和内在动力建立验证和关系。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Job engagement has recently become a fashionable term among Human Resource practitioners and Organizational Behavior researchers. However, academic research that has theoretically examined job engagement at the psychological level is limited, as is research on the nature of employee engagement, and its place among other job attitude constructs that are used to describe employees at work. I developed and validated a new measure of job engagement that assessed people's engagement during role performance. The predictive, convergent, and discriminant validity of job engagement was assessed with similar affective and cognitive work-related states, including job involvement, job satisfaction, intrinsic motivation, and the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale.; Results from confirmatory factor analysis indicated that job engagement was best represented as a higher-order factor with three lower-order dimensions of physical, emotional, and cognitive. Additional analyses suggested that the four job attitudes of job engagement, job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation are distinct but correlated attitudes. Hierarchical regression results revealed that employees who exhibited higher levels of job engagement were rated by their supervisors as demonstrating higher levels of task and contextual performance and lower levels of withdrawal behaviors. Importantly, these relationships were found after controlling for job satisfaction, job involvement, and intrinsic motivation. Specifically, job engagement predicted an additional 3% variance in task performance, an additional 4% variance in contextual performance, and an additional 10% variance in withdrawal behaviors. Moreover, job engagement predicted an additional 3% variance in task performance, an additional 6% variance in contextual performance, and an additional 7% variance in withdrawal behaviors over and above that predicted by the Utrecht Work Engagement Scale. I conclude with theoretical and practical implications as well as suggestions for future research.
机译:工作投入最近已成为人力资源从业人员和组织行为研究人员的时髦术语。但是,从理论上从心理层面检查工作投入的学术研究是有限的,有关员工投入的性质及其在用来描述工作中的员工的其他工作态度构造中的位置的研究也很有限。我开发并验证了一种新的工作投入量度,该方法可以评估人们在角色表现期间的投入度。在相似的情感和认知工作相关状态下评估了工作参与的预测性,收敛性和判别效度,包括工作参与度,工作满意度,内在动机和乌得勒支工作投入量表。验证性因素分析的结果表明,工作投入最好表示为一个较高阶的因素,具有三个较低阶的身体,情感和认知维度。其他分析表明,工作敬业度,工作满意度,工作参与度和内在动力这四种工作态度是截然不同但相互关联的态度。层次回归结果显示,表现出较高工作投入水平的员工被其上司评为表现出较高水平的任务和情境绩效以及较低水平的退缩行为。重要的是,这些关系是在控制了工作满意度,工作参与度和内在动机之后发现的。具体而言,工作投入预测任务绩效会额外增加3%的差异,上下文绩效会额外增加4%的差异,而退缩行为还会增加10%的差异。此外,工作投入预计任务绩效还会有3%的额外差异,情境绩效还会有6%的差异,而退缩行为的额外7%的差异会超出乌特勒支工作投入量表的预测范围。最后,我将给出理论和实践意义以及对未来研究的建议。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号