首页> 外文学位 >'I want a better life!' Examining juvenile drug treatment court participant characteristics: Is there a profile for success?
【24h】

'I want a better life!' Examining juvenile drug treatment court participant characteristics: Is there a profile for success?

机译:“我想要更好的生活!”检查青少年药物治疗法院参与者的特征:是否有成功的概况?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Juvenile Drug Treatment Court programs began operation in 1995; they are at a prime period for scholarly research and attention. Despite nearly two decades of operation, these therapeutic courts have lagged sorely behind their adult counterparts in empirical research. Only recently have professional drug court organizations and experts in the field recognized this gap in the scholarly conversation, as seen by the Special Issue on Juvenile Drug Courts, published by the National Drug Court Institute in 2010.;This research study examines one Juvenile Drug Treatment Court (JDTC) in Santa Clara County, California. Scholars and practitioners alike have questioned whether certain JDTC participant characteristics might be exhibited at intake that later associate with program successes. Likewise, there is inquiry into possible characteristics at intake that distinguish those youth who do not fare well in the drug court setting. Demographic and motivational variables at intake from the American Society of Addiction Medicine Patient Placement Criteria (ASAM PPC) assessment were coded using thematic analysis and examined for two compared groups, 20 JDTC graduates and 20 nongraduates between the years 2008 and 2010. Multiple chi-square tests of independence and two Pearson correlation coefficient tests were run using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). Results were then described from two perspectives: statistical significance and clinical significance.;Very few demographic variables (such as age, grade level, ethnicity) were statistically significantly related to program graduation. However, in Santa Clara County, females appear to graduate close to a statistically significant rate higher than males, 78% as compared to 42%. Similarly, very few of the coded motivational variables revealed statistical significance in relation to program graduations. This finding suggests that both JDTC graduates and nongraduates have similar characteristics and motivational themes for program participation at intake. This finding also suggests that motivational schemes differentiate at some point during treatment. More extensive research is needed to explore these during-treatment motivational shifts.;The "stage of change" variable, which is an indicator of motivational level, was significantly interdependent with "how important" a youth felt addressing his or her substance use issue. Of this youth sample, 72.5% were rated as in the "Contemplative stage of change," indicating a rather high degree of ambiguity about making a change in their lives. However, when coupled with their responses that addressing their substance use patterns were considerably important to them, this study found that JDTC participants were more likely to graduate. This finding is consistent with the Boghosian study (2006) that suggests that those adolescents who are more "consciously aware of both the symptoms and negative consequences of their substance use behavior" may benefit more from JDTC intervention. Further is the suggestion that more sophisticated analyses of the interrelationships amongst ASAM PPC variables are warranted.;The most prominent clinical finding in this study was the theme of relationship expressed by both JDTC graduates and nongraduates. The theme of relationship and the anticipation of receiving help to address their issues wove strongly in and out of the thematic patterns in this sample. This study found that parent involvement was statistically significant in relation to JDTC graduation. JDTC graduates had more parent involvement than the nongraduate comparison group. This finding is consistent with previous literature that indicates the importance of family intervention with delinquent youth, as well as the necessity of developing supportive relationships in adolescence.;Key words: juvenile drug court, drug court, motivational theory, juvenile delinquency, drug court graduates, drug court characteristics.
机译:少年毒品法院的方案于1995年开始执行;他们正处于学术研究和关注的黄金时期。尽管运作了将近二十年,但在经验研究中,这些治疗法院仍然远远落后于成年法院。直到最近,专业的毒品法庭组织和该领域的专家才意识到这种学术交流中的差距,正如美国国家毒品法院研究所于2010年出版的《少年毒品法院特别问题》所看到的那样。该研究研究了一种少年毒品治疗加利福尼亚州圣克拉拉县的法院(JDTC)。学者和从业者都质疑是否某些JDTC参与者特征会在入学时展现出来,然后与计划成功相关。同样,对摄入量的可能特征也进行了调查,以区别那些在毒品法庭中表现不佳的年轻人。使用主题分析对从美国成瘾医学会患者安置标准(ASAM PPC)评估中摄入的人口统计学和动机变量进行编码,并检查了两个比较组,即2008年至2010年期间的20名JDTC毕业生和20名非毕业生。独立性检验和两个Pearson相关系数检验均使用社会科学统计软件包(SPSS)进行。然后从两个角度描述了结果:统计学意义和临床意义。极少的人口统计学变量(例如年龄,等级水平,种族)在统计学上与课程毕业显着相关。然而,在圣塔克拉拉县,女性的毕业率似乎比男性高出统计学上显着的比例,男性为78%,而男性为42%。同样,很少有编码的动机变量显示出与程序毕业率相关的统计意义。这一发现表明,JDTC的毕业生和非毕业生都具有相似的特征和动机主题,参与课程的学习。这一发现还表明,动机方案在治疗过程中的某些时候会有所不同。需要更广泛的研究来探索这些治疗中的动机转变。“变化阶段”变量是动机水平的指标,与年轻人在解决其毒品使用问题上的“重要性”显着相关。在这个年轻人样本中,有72.5%的人被认为处于“变革的沉思阶段”,这表明他们对改变生活的态度相当模糊。但是,当结合他们的回答(针对他们的药物使用模式)对他们而言非常重要时,这项研究发现JDTC参与者更有可能毕业。这一发现与Boghosian研究(2006年)一致,该研究表明,那些“更加有意识地意识到其吸毒行为的症状和消极后果的青少年”可能会从JDTC干预中受益更多。进一步的建议是,有必要对ASAM PPC变量之间的相互关系进行更复杂的分析。;本研究中最突出的临床发现是JDTC毕业生和非毕业生都表达了关系的主题。关系的主题和期望获得帮助来解决他们的问题的意愿在本示例的主题模式之内和之外都强烈地摇摆着。这项研究发现,父母参与程度与JDTC毕业率有关。 JDTC毕业生比非毕业生比较组有更多的父母参与。这一发现与以前的文献一致,该文献表明了对青少年进行家庭干预的重要性,以及在青少年时期建立支持性关系的必要性。关键词:少年毒品法院,毒品法院,动机理论,少年犯罪,毒品法院毕业生,毒品法庭的特点。

著录项

  • 作者

    Etheridge, Tianna D.;

  • 作者单位

    Fielding Graduate University.;

  • 授予单位 Fielding Graduate University.;
  • 学科 Law.;Psychology Developmental.;Sociology Criminology and Penology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2013
  • 页码 191 p.
  • 总页数 191
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号