首页> 外文学位 >Corporate governance, auditor choice and auditor switch: Evidence from China.
【24h】

Corporate governance, auditor choice and auditor switch: Evidence from China.

机译:公司治理,审计师选择和审计师转换:来自中国的证据。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In recent years, the quality of disclosure has become one of the most important issues in the public debate on corporate governance. Investors need relevant and reliable financial and operating information. It is regarded as a critical feature for proper functioning of corporate governance: disclosure allows public investors to monitor firms, and thus supports capital market development. Auditing is among the most important mechanisms for proper information disclosure.; As the largest and fastest growing emerging market, China is becoming more and more important to investors throughout the world. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the association between firms' internal corporate governance mechanism and their auditor choice and auditor switch decisions and how investors respond to firms' auditor choice and auditor switch decisions in the Chinese context.; High ownership concentration is a basic feature of the listed firms in China. In firms with high ownership concentration, controlling owners have a tradeoff between improving corporate governance and reaping opaqueness gains from weak corporate governance mechanism. One major benefit with improved corporate governance is firms can raise capital at a lower cost (Fan and Wong 2005). In this study I carefully choose a specific period of 2001-2004, when China saw a continuous bear market. During this period, the Chinese listed firms are unlikely to issue equity to the public, hence benefits from lowering capital raising costs are trivial. Accordingly, concerns of reaping the opaqueness gains from weak corporate governance mechanism likely dominate the listed firms' auditor choice and auditor switch decisions.; Several factors motivated this study. First, the unique auditing market in China presents an interesting arena for the study of auditor choice and auditor switch. Different from the developed economies, the Chinese accounting and auditing professions are not only regulated but also administered by government agencies (Chen et al. 2000). Second, the Chinese Institute of Certified Public Accountants (CICPA) has just begun to rank auditors in China, which presents an opportunity for identifying high-quality auditors in the Chinese context. Third, controlling shareholders have incentives both for and against hiring a high-quality auditor. Hiring a high-quality auditor may improve firms' corporate governance, but in doing so the controlling shareholders may lose the opaqueness gains. It is usually difficult to disentangle the two incentives. However, during the bear market of 2001-2004, the "for" incentive is greatly suppressed, which provides a good opportunity to study the association between firms' internal corporate governance mechanism and their decisions on auditor choice and auditor switch. Fourth, the market response to firms' decisions on auditor choice and auditor switch may be different from that in the developed Western world because the incentives for earnings management in China are of distinctive nature.; Three variables are used to proxy for firms' internal corporate governance mechanism, i.e., the ownership concentration, the size of the supervisory board (SB), and the duality of the CEO and the chairman of the board of directors (BoD). Since the year of 2003, CICPA publicizes the ranking of audit firms in China according to their annual revenues. I classify all auditors in China into the large auditors (Top 10) and others (non-Top 10). The empirical results show that firms with larger controlling owners, with smaller size of SB, or in which the CEO and the BoD chairman are held by the same person are less likely to hire a Top 10 auditor. This suggests that when benefits from lowering capital raising costs are trivial, firms with weaker internal corporate governance mechanism are inclined to choose a low-quality auditor so as to sustain their opaqueness gains.; Further to prior research, I identify two major types of auditor switch, namely switching to
机译:近年来,公开质量已经成为有关公司治理的公开辩论中最重要的问题之一。投资者需要相关和可靠的财务和运营信息。它被认为是公司治理正常运作的关键特征:披露允许公众投资者监视公司,从而支持资本市场发展。审计是适当信息公开的最重要机制之一。作为最大,增长最快的新兴市场,中国对全世界的投资者越来越重要。本文的目的是调查企业内部公司治理机制与他们的审计师选择和审计师转换决策之间的关联,以及投资者如何在中国背景下对公司的审计师选择和审计师转换决策做出反应。高所有权集中度是中国上市公司的基本特征。在所有权集中度高的公司中,控股所有者在改善公司治理与从弱公司治理机制中获得不透明收益之间进行权衡。改善公司治理的一个主要好处是公司可以以较低的成本筹集资金(Fan and Wong 2005)。在这项研究中,我精心选择了2001年至2004年的特定时期,那时中国看到了持续的熊市。在此期间,中国上市公司不太可能向公众发行股票,因此降低集资成本的收益微不足道。因此,担心由于公司治理机制薄弱而带来的不透明收益可能会主导上市公司的审计师选择和审计师转换决策。几个因素推动了这项研究。首先,中国独特的审计市场为研究审计师选择和审计师转换提供了一个有趣的舞台。与发达经济体不同,中国的会计和审计行业不仅受到监管,而且还受到政府机构的管理(Chen et al。2000)。其次,中国注册会计师协会(CICPA)刚刚开始对中国的审计师进行排名,这为在中国背景下确定高素质的审计师提供了机会。第三,控股股东既有激励也有反对雇用高素质审计师的动机。聘请高素质的审计师可能会改善公司的公司治理,但这样做可能会使控股股东失去不透明的收益。通常很难区分这两种诱因。但是,在2001年至2004年的熊市期间,“为”激励被大大抑制了,这为研究公司内部公司治理机制与审计师选择和审计师转换决策之间的联系提供了很好的机会。第四,市场对公司关于审计师选择和审计师选择的决定的反应可能与西方发达国家不同,因为中国对盈余管理的激励具有独特性。使用三个变量来代表企业的内部公司治理机制,即所有权集中度,监事会规模(SB)以及首席执行官和董事会主席的双重性。自2003年以来,中注协根据其年收入公布中国审计公司的排名。我将中国的所有审计师分为大型审计师(前10名)和其他审计师(非前10名)。实证结果表明,控股股东更大,SB规模较小或首席执行官和董事会主席由同一人担任的公司聘用前十名审计师的可能性较小。这表明当降低集资成本的收益微不足道时,内部公司治理机制较弱的公司倾向于选择低素质的审计师,以维持其不透明的收益。在先前研究的基础上,我确定了两种主要的审计师转换类型,即

著录项

  • 作者

    Liu, Ming.;

  • 作者单位

    Hong Kong Baptist University (Hong Kong).;

  • 授予单位 Hong Kong Baptist University (Hong Kong).;
  • 学科 Business Administration Accounting.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 138 p.
  • 总页数 138
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 财务管理、经济核算;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号