首页> 外文学位 >Walter Ralegh's 'History of the World' and the historical culture of the late Renaissance.
【24h】

Walter Ralegh's 'History of the World' and the historical culture of the late Renaissance.

机译:沃尔特·拉格(Walter Ralegh)的“世界历史”和文艺复兴后期的历史文化。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

My dissertation is a full-length study of Walter Ralegh's 1614 History of the World. This massive volume was a best seller in seventeenth-century England, running through over a dozen editions, reprints, and abridgements in the century after its publication. Ralegh wrote the work while imprisoned in the Tower of London. Covering the period from Creation to 168 BC, it was composed with the help of a large library he was allowed to keep in his cell. He had been convicted on a trumped up charge of treason and spared execution only by the mercy of King James I. But royalists read him also; Charles I's chaplain produced an abridgement and a continuation of the "History", and the antiquarian Sir Thomas Browne quoted it verbatim (without citation). The "History" was given a prominent place on the bookshelves of readers in the seventeenth century, the first major English treatment of the ancient histories of Assyria, Persia, Greece, Rome and Egypt, a historical classic in its own right.;Ralegh himself has often been portrayed as a herald of modernity. He has been characterized as a republican theorist, a man of science, an empire builder, a forward-thinking skeptic, a Cold War strategist, and a modern bureaucrat. I instead tie Ralegh's "History" to a pan-European polemical and scholarly context, and I show how his work was one manifestation of the culture of historical counsel in which diplomats and officials from Naples to Scotland participated. But I do not simply debunk Ralegh's image as harbinger of a new era. Rather, I show that elements many have defined as indicative of his modernity emerged from his immersion in an intellectual and political context in which erudite statesmen that interpreted new discoveries by ancient precedents and explained world transformations by meticulously scrutinizing alterations in the past. And by closely analyzing his sources---predominantly dense Latin tomes printed on the continent---I demonstrate how firmly these practices were embedded within the education and values of scholars and statesmen throughout Europe.;After a brief introduction concerning Ralegh's biography, my first chapter studies the place of history in the erudite political culture to which he belonged, and the status of knowledge about the past as articulated in his sources. History was the most fashionable discipline of the late sixteenth century. Princes, prelates and diplomats read histories as training grounds for public and ecclesiastical action, and scholars eagerly sought historical minutiae in obscure texts and far-flung locales. Having established what the field of history was, and why a man of action like Ralegh devoted so much energy to it, I move to a series of studies examining the particular forces that Ralegh believed structured events of the past. The first explores Ralegh's selection of sources in constructing his world chronology, arguing that the desire to comprehensively explicate exotic sources facilitated the erosion of venerated textual authorities. In the second, I use his rare geographical notebook to examine his methods of reading and note-taking, and I show how early modern techniques for assembling information generated novel ways of generating knowledge. The third study investigates Ralegh's understanding of the economy of historical change, showing how he attributed theological implications to the travel of the present by identifying the divine significance embedded in explorations and migration in the past. These chapters demonstrate that Ralegh constructed his "History" by methodically deploying techniques of observation and analysis that learned counselors throughout Europe practiced.;The subsequent series of case studies focus on historical forms that Ralegh traced in his "History". The first concerns the history of learning, and demonstrates how Ralegh drew vital lessons concerning intellectual authority and the appropriate objects of sacerdotal study by examining Near Eastern societies dead for millennia. The second considers Ralegh's study of military science and the role of war in history, showing how Ralegh assimilated and lamented the violent upheaval of his era through analysis of ancient warfare. The last examines his history of politics, closely analyzing how Ralegh saw providence at work in the transformations of empires, and detailing how Ralegh, like his contemporaries, used historical study to argue to either limit or expand monarchical authority. Lastly, an epilogue investigates how seventeenth- and eighteenth-century readers of the "History" approached the text with their own expectations while also imbibing Ralegh's idealized vision of world history.;The dissertation examines how early modern scholars deployed techniques of historical observation and analysis in the formulation of a modern vision of the world. Neither a Renaissance that passively inherited an easily-defined Western tradition, nor one that allowed new discoveries to brush the classical patrimony away, Ralegh's Renaissance struggled to find tools to understand the exploration of the New World in ancient Palestine, the revelation of Christianity amongst ancient Greeks, the military revolution amongst the ancient Hebrews, and the modern world in ancient Mesopotamia.
机译:我的论文是对沃尔特·拉格(Walter Ralegh)的1614年世界历史的完整研究。如此庞大的销量是17世纪英格兰的畅销书,在其出版后的一个世纪中,它经过十几个版本,重印和删节。拉雷格被囚禁在伦敦塔时写了这幅作品。涵盖了从创世到公元前168年的这段时期,它是在一个大型图书馆的帮助下完成的,他被允许保存在自己的牢房中。他被以叛国罪的罪魁祸首被判有罪,并且仅靠国王詹姆士一世的宽恕就被处决。查尔斯一世的牧师产生了“历史”的删节和延续,古物托马斯·布朗爵士(Sir Thomas Browne)逐字引用(未引用)。十七世纪,“历史”在读者的书架上占有重要位置,这是对亚述,波斯,希腊,罗马和埃及的古代历史进行的第一个主要的英语处理,这本身就是一部历史经典。通常被描绘成现代的先驱。他的特征是共和党理论家,科学人,帝国建设者,有远见的怀疑论者,冷战战略家和现代官僚。我取而代之的是,我把拉勒的《历史》与泛欧的辩论和学术背景联系起来,我展示了他的工作是如何体现那不勒斯到苏格兰的外交官和官员的历史顾问文化的一种体现。但是,我不只是揭穿Ralegh作为新时代预兆的形象。相反,我表明,许多人定义为他的现代性的元素来自他对知识分子和政治环境的沉浸,在这种情况下,博学的政治家通过古老的先例来解释新发现,并通过仔细审查过去的变化来解释世界的转变。通过仔细分析他的资料来源-主要印在非洲大陆上的密集拉丁文-我证明了这些做法在欧洲各地的学者和政治家的教育和价值观中的牢固扎根。第一章研究了他所属的博学的政治文化中的历史地位,以及他的资料来源所阐明的关于过去的知识地位。历史是16世纪后期最流行的学科。王子,主教和外交官把历史作为公共和教会行动的训练场,学者们热切地希望在模糊的文本和遥远的地方寻找历史细节。在确定了历史领域是什么之后,以及为什么像拉勒(Ralegh)这样的行动主义者为此投入了如此多的精力,我将进行一系列研究,研究拉格认为过去的结构性事件的特殊力量。第一部分探讨了Ralegh在构建其世界年表时的来源选择,认为全面阐释外来资源的愿望助长了尊敬的文本权威的侵蚀。在第二篇文章中,我用他稀有的地理笔记本检查了他的阅读和记笔记方法,并且展示了早期的现代信息组装技术如何产生新颖的知识产生方式。第三项研究调查了Ralegh对历史变化经济的理解,显示了他如何通过识别过去探索和移民中所蕴含的神圣意义,将神学意义归因于当前的旅行。这些章节表明,拉勒格通过有条理地部署观察和分析技术来构造他的“历史”,这是整个欧洲学习过的咨询师所实践的。;随后的一系列案例研究集中于拉勒格在其“历史”中追溯的历史形式。第一个问题涉及学习的历史,并通过考察几千年来已经死亡的近东社会,展示了拉勒格如何汲取关于知识权威和适当的研究对象的重要教训。第二部分考虑了拉勒格对军事科学的研究以及战争在历史中的作用,通过分析古代战争,展示了拉勒格如何同化和哀叹他时代的暴力动荡。最后一部分审视了他的政治历史,仔细分析了拉格在帝国的转变中如何看待天意,并详细介绍了拉格与他的同时代人如何使用历史研究来论证限制或扩大君主制权威。最后,一个结语调查了“历史”的十七和十八世纪的读者如何以他们自己的期望来对待文本,同时也吸收了拉格对世界历史的理想化视野。论文研究了早期现代学者如何运用历史观察和分析技术在制定现代世界观方面。既没有被动地继承了容易定义的西方传统的文艺复兴时期拉莱(Ralegh)的文艺复兴时期(Renaissance)努力寻找工具,以了解古代巴勒斯坦对新世界的探索,古希腊人对基督教的启示,古希伯来人之间的军事革命以及美索不达米亚的现代世界。

著录项

  • 作者

    Popper, Nicholas Seth.;

  • 作者单位

    Princeton University.;

  • 授予单位 Princeton University.;
  • 学科 History European.;History of Science.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 475 p.
  • 总页数 475
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号