首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian Journal of History >Positioning in the Cold War - Swedish and Danish History Textbooks and the Totalitarianism Doctrine. Historical Cultures in Comparison
【24h】

Positioning in the Cold War - Swedish and Danish History Textbooks and the Totalitarianism Doctrine. Historical Cultures in Comparison

机译:在冷战中的​​定位-瑞典和丹麦历史教科书以及极权主义学说。比较中的历史文化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

The Nordic countries Sweden and Denmark have a long and intertwined history. The Second World War, though, formed different experiences in the two countries that led to diverging paths in the Cold War. Denmark became a member of North Atlantic Treaty Organization, while Sweden stayed non-aligned. Thus, it can be assumed that Denmark was more likely to adopt Western foreign policies and doctrines than Sweden. Or was it? On a programmatic political level this may have been the case, but what about cultural perceptions developed in Swedish and Danish ‘minds of men’? Is there a tension between les évenéments and les longues durées?The underlying assumption in this article is that there is a contradiction and a tension between the programmatic political level and historically-inherited enemy images, and that this tension may be studied through the concept of totalitarianism and its position in the historical cultures of Sweden and Denmark in the post-war era. The totalitarianism doctrine was one of the main ideological weapons during the Cold War, serving as a basis for the Truman doctrine. It implies that Nazism and Soviet communism shared common features and may be subsumed under the same label. But would a Dane find it reasonable to view the Red Army, which belonged to the Allies which liberated his or her country, as of ‘the same kind’ as the German occupants? And would it make sense to a Swede to stay neutral to Soviet Russia, the historical enemy? The one who for a Swede is ‘the other’ might for a Dane appear as a historical ally.The empirical sources are history textbooks for senior secondary school students, studied as artefacts of national historical cultures.View full textDownload full textKeywordstotalitarianism, historical culture, history textbooks, Sweden, Denmark, Cold WarRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.706772
机译:北欧国家瑞典和丹麦有着悠久而交织的历史。但是,第二次世界大战在两国形成了不同的经历,导致了冷战时期的分歧。丹麦成为北大西洋公约组织的成员,而瑞典则保持不结盟。因此,可以假设丹麦比瑞典更有可能采用西方外交政策和学说。还是吗?在计划政治层面上可能是这种情况,但是瑞典和丹麦的“男人思想”在文化观念上又如何发展呢? lesvenés和les longuesdurées之间是否存在紧张关系?本文的基本假设是,程序政治和历史继承的敌人形象之间存在矛盾和紧张关系,这种紧张关系可能通过极权主义的概念及其在战后时代在瑞典和丹麦的历史文化中的地位进行研究。极权主义是冷战时期的主要思想武器之一,是杜鲁门主义的基础。这意味着纳粹主义和苏维埃共产主义有共同的特点,可能被归入同一标签。但是,戴恩(Dane)认为将属于解放其国家的同盟国的红军与德国占领者视为“同一种”是合理的吗?对于瑞典人来说,对历史上的敌人苏联保持中立是否有意义?瑞典人是丹麦人,丹麦人可能是历史盟友。经验来源是作为民族历史文化文物研究的高中历史教科书。查看全文下载全文关键字stotalitarianism,历史文化,历史教科书,瑞典,丹麦,冷战相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“泰勒和弗朗西斯在线”,service_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多” ,pubid:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03468755.2012.706772

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号