首页> 外文学位 >Bimodal inhibition of return and discrepant cuing.
【24h】

Bimodal inhibition of return and discrepant cuing.

机译:双峰抑制返回和差异提示。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The attentional phenomenon, inhibition of return (IOR), is evaluated in a series of experiments using peripheral visual cues, central visual cues, binaural verbal audio cues, and combinations thereof. Experiments 1a, b, and c tested for IOR using the cues individually at inter-stimulus intervals of 0 and 500 milliseconds. Results found IOR in the peripheral visual cue condition but not in response to the other conditions. Experiment 2a tested for IOR using congruent visual peripheral and binaural verbal cues. Experiment 2b used congruent visual central and binaural verbal cues. Results indicated a possible IOR effect in response to the visual peripheral/verbal audio cue combination, however it may have been masked by the intersensory facilitation effect. Results to central visual/verbal audio cue combination found a significant effect of cue condition, but no IOR. Experiments 3a and b were similar to 2a and b however incongruent cue combinations were used. Indications of IOR were present in response to some visual peripheral/audio combinations. In all cases, response times to cue combinations using peripheral visual cues were longer than to combinations using central visual cues. Importantly, Experiments 3a and b demonstrated differential responding based on the validity of verbal cues, thus indicating that the validity of the verbal cue was a significant factor, but only when the visual cues were invalid. This suggests that while visual cues may have a preferential role in attentional mechanisms, verbal cues can also play a significant role in space-based attentional shifts to visual targets. This research has implications for all industries and environments using visual and/or audio cues to direct attention. Such industries include aviation, communication, transportation, emergency agencies, and more.
机译:在一系列实验中,使用外围视觉提示,中央视觉提示,双耳言语音频提示及其组合对注意力现象(抑制返回抑制(IOR))进行了评估。实验1a,b和c使用提示分别在0和500毫秒的刺激间隔下测试了IOR。结果发现IOR在周围视觉提示条件下,但未响应其他条件。实验2a使用一致的视觉周边和双耳言语提示测试了IOR。实验2b使用了一致的视觉中枢和双耳言语提示。结果表明,可能会对视觉周边/言语提示音组合产生IOR效应,但是可能已被感官间促进效应掩盖了。中心视觉/语言音频提示组合的结果发现提示条件有显着影响,但没有IOR。实验3a和b与2a和b类似,但是使用了不一致的提示组合。出现IOR迹象是对某些视觉外围设备/音频组合的反应。在所有情况下,对使用周边视觉提示的提示组合的响应时间都比使用中央视觉提示的组合的响应时间长。重要的是,实验3a和b展示了基于言语提示有效性的微分响应,因此表明言语提示的有效性是一个重要因素,但仅当视觉提示无效时才如此。这表明,尽管视觉提示在注意力机制中可能具有优先作用,但言语提示在空基注意力向视觉目标的转移中也可以发挥重要作用。这项研究对于使用视觉和/或音频提示直接引起注意的所有行业和环境都有影响。这些行业包括航空,通讯,运输,应急机构等等。

著录项

  • 作者

    Loring-Meier, T.;

  • 作者单位

    Loma Linda University.;

  • 授予单位 Loma Linda University.;
  • 学科 Psychology Behavioral.; Psychology Experimental.; Psychology Cognitive.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 106 p.
  • 总页数 106
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 心理学;心理学;心理学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号