首页> 外文学位 >The ethical primacy of autonomy and informed consent for human genomic-related screening, testing and research.
【24h】

The ethical primacy of autonomy and informed consent for human genomic-related screening, testing and research.

机译:在人类基因组相关的筛查,测试和研究中,自治和知情同意的道德至上性。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation examines how genomics impacts on the relationship between individual and group interests from the perspective of the autonomous choice model of informed consent. Specifically, this work evaluates whether individual informed consent for genomic-related screening, testing, and research is sustainable in light of competing ethical values and interests of others.; For the analysis, a four-step approach is used throughout the dissertation. First, four theoretical formulations of informed consent are identified: individual express consent; substituted judgment; best-interests; and research consent. Second, each formulation is refined by adding relevant ethical, authority, guidance, and intervention principles. This results in the construction of four 'ideal' informed consent models. Third, genomic-related screening, testing, and research scenarios are applied to these ideal models. For those situations where the elements of the informed consent model are not being satisfied due to conflicts, the analysis proceeds to the final step. Fourth, the overriding justification framework is employed to determine whether individual informed consent deserves ethical primacy over the competing interests of others.; Eight genomic-related activities are analyzed using the four-step approach. When the material is synthesized, it suggests three conclusions. First, individual autonomy---through the doctrine of informed consent---is entitled to ethical primacy at the present time. Second, and perhaps more importantly, personal autonomy is not absolute; individual ethical interests may be overridden when five justificatory conditions are met: effectiveness, proportionality, necessity, least infringement, and transparency. Finally, there is need for great care when evaluating informed consent in an age of genomic medicine: it requires case-by-case assessment in a morally responsible manner. To this end, a flexible approach to informed consent is proposed---one which is derived from the dissertation analysis.
机译:本文从知情同意的自主选择模型的角度探讨了基因组学对个体利益与群体利益之间关系的影响。具体而言,这项工作根据竞争的道德价值观和他人的利益,评估了与基因组相关的筛查,测试和研究的个人知情同意是否可持续。为了进行分析,全文采用了四步法。首先,确定了四种知情同意的理论表述:个人明确同意;替代判决最佳利益;和研究同意书。其次,通过增加相关的道德规范,权威,指导和干预原则来完善每种提法。这导致了四个“理想的”知情同意模型的构建。第三,将基因组相关的筛选,测试和研究方案应用于这些理想模型。对于由于冲突未能满足知情同意模型的元素的情况,分析将进行到最后一步。第四,采用压倒一切的理由框架来确定个人知情同意是否值得在他人的竞争利益上享有道德上的首要地位。使用四步法分析了八种与基因组相关的活动。当合成材料时,提出了三个结论。首先,通过知情同意的学说,个人自主权目前有权享有道德至上的地位。其次,也许更重要的是,个人自主权不是绝对的。当满足五个合理条件时,个人的道德利益可能会被压倒:有效性,相称性,必要性,最少侵权和透明性。最后,在评估基因组医学时代的知情同意时,需要格外小心:它需要以对道德负责的方式逐案评估。为此,提出了一种灵活的知情同意方法-这是从论文分析中得出的。

著录项

  • 作者

    Van Derven, Jill A.;

  • 作者单位

    Saint Louis University.;

  • 授予单位 Saint Louis University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Health Care Management.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 308 p.
  • 总页数 308
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:40:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号