首页> 外文学位 >Apocalypticism, gnosticism and the scribes of Qumran and Nag Hammadi.
【24h】

Apocalypticism, gnosticism and the scribes of Qumran and Nag Hammadi.

机译:世界末日主义,不可知论者和昆兰和纳格·哈马迪的抄写员。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Within historical reconstructions of religion, there has been a scholarly prioritization of nascent Christianity. Based upon the adoption of a Christian mythical narrative, historical reconstructions have understood Christianity as the inheritor and fulfillment of the salvation history of ancient Israel, and as such a "unique" and sans pareil religion in relation to other Hellenistic expressions of late antiquity. In the interest of shoring-up this construction, scholarship has created two binary categories: (A) Apocalypticism as a way of linking "unique" Christianity to the prestigious pedigree of a sui generis Judaism. (B) Gnosticism as a way to quarantine those analogous and "heretical" expressions that threaten the uniqueness of this mythical construction.; Within the framework of this Christian mythical model, scholars have subsequently juxtaposed the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Library as two diametrically opposed collections by deploying the Dead Sea Scrolls as "legitimately apocalyptic" and as such completely separate from the "Gnostic" Nag Hammadi Library.; This assumption, however, is simply wrong.; By examining the scholarly criteria for "Apocalypticism" and "Gnosticism," and the variety of hermeneutics used to deploy texts within these categories, this thesis will argue that, in the interest of buttressing the Christian mythical narrative, scholars have used the "Apocalyptic" Dead Sea Scrolls as a cipher for that which should or could be legitimately Christian and the "Gnostic" Nag Hammadi Library as that which should not or cannot be legitimately Christian.; In addition, through an examination of the social-political crucible that produced both collections, this thesis will argue that the Dead Sea Scrolls and the Nag Hammadi Library are not diametrically opposed, but are linked in three significant ways: (1) a shared an Enochic worldview that was used (2) by marginalized elements of the scribal class who (3) were reacting to the political reality of cessation of native rule and the lack of a royal patron under Hellenism.
机译:在宗教的历史重建中,学术界对新生基督教进行了优先排序。在采用基督教神话叙事的基础上,历史重建将基督教理解为古代以色列救赎历史的继承者和实现者,并且与晚期古希腊语的其他希腊文表达形式一样,是这样的“独特”和无与伦比的宗教。为了支持这种结构,奖学金创建了两个二进制类别:(A)世界末日主义是一种将“独特的”基督教与一种特殊的犹太教谱系联系起来的方式。 (B)诺斯替教徒隔离那些威胁到这种神话结构独特性的类比和“异​​端”表达的方式。在这种基督教神话模式的框架内,学者们随后将死海古卷以“合法世界末日”的形式部署,并将死海古卷和纳格·哈马迪图书馆并列为两个截然相反的馆藏,并与“诺斯替人”纳格·哈马迪完全分开图书馆。;但是,这种假设是完全错误的。通过研究“启示论”和“诺斯替教”的学术标准,以及用于在这些类别中展开文本的各种诠释学,本论文将指出,为了支持基督教神话叙事,学者们使用了“启示录”。死海古卷是应该或可能是合法基督教的密码,而“诺斯替”纳格·哈马迪图书馆则是不应该或不能合法基督教的密码。此外,通过考察产生这两个收藏的社会政治坩埚,本论文将论证,《死海古卷》和《纳格·哈马迪图书馆》并没有完全对立,而是通过三种重要方式联系在一起的:(1)抄写员阶层的边缘化成员使用(2)的Enochic世界观,他们(3)对停止本地统治和在希腊化时期缺乏皇家保护者的政治现实做出反应。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kanigan-Fairen, Glen J.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Regina (Canada).;

  • 授予单位 The University of Regina (Canada).;
  • 学科 Religion History of.
  • 学位 M.A.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 203 p.
  • 总页数 203
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 宗教史、宗教地理;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号