首页> 外文学位 >Asia first: China and American conservatism, 1937--1965.
【24h】

Asia first: China and American conservatism, 1937--1965.

机译:亚洲第一:中国和美国的保守主义,1937--1965年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation traces the influence of U.S.-China relations upon the development of the American Right. Although they have long been considered isolationist, conservative leaders were in fact deeply interested in foreign affairs. The origins of a distinctive diplomatic ethos can be traced through their positions on U.S. foreign policy in Asia during the early Cold War period. From the communization of China in 1949 through the 1960s, conservatives combined anti-communism with nostalgia for an idiosyncratic Sino-American relationship to formulate an orientalism that renovated the Right for a globalized postwar era. The "Asia First" doctrine was born of the Cold War yet inspired by the Open Door, and it instilled conservatism with a sense of worldwide purpose.; The transition from isolationist "Old" Right to internationalist "New" Right was a difficult one to make. In order to develop its own brand of foreign relations, conservatism needed to overcome a longstanding tradition of isolationist thinking typified by George Washington's farewell address and the Monroe Doctrine. Pearl Harbor and America's subsequent world status made doctrinaire isolationism impossible; yet for conservative Republicans, the concept of bipartisan foreign policy was also not an option. They found their answer in the Far East and a very willing partner in the Chinese Nationalist leader Chiang Kai-shek.; Within national politics, the China issue mended divisions between the Right's elite and popular branches, thus making a significant contribution to the future successes of the conservative movement. Much of this growth can be attributed to Asia First's ability to galvanize grassroots conservatives to action, as well as the remarkable longevity of the "loss" of China as a cautionary tale. Even as conservative elites gained a toehold in the debate over official foreign policy, activists on the ground practiced their own style of international mediation. American supporters of Chiang's China tested traditional diplomatic boundaries through their actions as missionaries, fundraisers, journalists, and district organizers.; This project contributes to both the historiography of U.S. foreign relations and the growing literature on the American Right. As the narrative delineates the connection between postwar conservatism and the Pacific Rim, it reconsiders the context and conduct of Sino-American relations while adding a much-needed diplomatic angle to historical analysis of rightwing political culture. The evolution of Asia First exposes the genesis of a platform today expected of the Republican Party: unilateral action overseas, antipathy toward the United Nations, and a military defense state. A reworking of orientalist ideology was a vital part of what made the New Right "new." As a result, crusading conservatism has permanently shaped perceptions of the U.S. abroad, influencing how other nations have understood and reacted to our foreign policy.; Chapters 1 and 3 analyze the roles of Robert Taft and William Knowland, two U.S. Senators who legitimized internationalism as a way to challenge liberal consensus. Chapters 2 and 4 focus on Alfred Kohlberg (architect of the China Lobby) and Robert Welch (founder of the John Birch Society), Asia First activists who organized the popular Right. By alternating between elite and grassroots leaders, the narrative demonstrates a connection forged by Asia First and translated into a unity that culminated with Barry Goldwater's presidential nomination at the 1964 GOP convention, the subject of Chapter 5. Extending beyond party politics, the coda examines the Hawaiian statehood debate; it seeks to show the fissures within conservative internationalism, specifically the Right's difficulty in resolving largesse abroad with racial discrimination at home during the Cold War.
机译:本文追溯了美中关系对美国权利发展的影响。尽管长期以来人们一直认为他们是孤立主义者,但保守派领导人实际上对外交事务非常感兴趣。可以通过冷战初期美国对亚洲外交政策的立场来追溯独特的外交风气的起源。从1949年的中国共产主义到1960年代,保守派将反共和怀旧相结合,以建立一种特殊的中美关系,从而形成了一种东方主义,为战后全球化时代的右翼人物提供了革新。 “亚洲第一”学说源于冷战,但受到“门户开放”的启发,它以世界性的目的灌输了保守主义。从孤立主义的“旧”权利向国际主义的“新”权利过渡是一件困难的事情。为了发展自己的外交关系品牌,保守主义需要克服乔治·华盛顿告别演说和门罗主义所代表的长期孤立主义思想传统。珍珠港和美国后来的世界地位使教条主义孤立主义成为不可能。但是对于保守的共和党人来说,两党外交政策的概念也不是一个选择。他们在远东找到了答案,并且是中国国民党领袖蒋介石的一个非常愿意的伙伴。在国家政治内部,中国问题修正了右翼精英和人民各部门之间的分歧,从而为保守运动的未来成功做出了重大贡献。这种增长的很大一部分归因于《亚洲第一》号召基层保守派采取行动的能力,以及作为警告性故事的中国“损失”的长寿。即使保守派精英们在有关官方外交政策的辩论中崭露头角,当地的激进主义者仍在实践自己的国际调解风格。美国蒋介石在中国的支持者通过传教士,筹款活动,新闻工作者和地区组织者的行动,检验了传统的外交界限。该项目为美国对外关系史和美国权利文献的发展做出了贡献。由于叙事描述了战后保守主义与环太平洋之间的联系,因此它重新考虑了中美关系的背景和行为,同时在对右翼政治文化的历史分析中增加了急需的外交角度。亚洲第一的演变揭示了共和党今天所期望的一个平台的起源:在海外的单方面行动,对联合国的反感和一个军事防御国。重塑东方主义意识形态是使新权利“新”的重要组成部分。结果,严厉的保守主义已经永久性地改变了人们对美国在国外的看法,影响了其他国家对我们外交政策的理解和反应。第1章和第3章分析了两位美国参议员罗伯特·塔夫脱(Robert Taft)和威廉·诺兰(William Knowland)的角色,他们将国际主义合法化,以此来挑战自由主义共识。第2章和第4章重点讨论了组织了受欢迎的Right的亚洲第一积极分子Alfred Kohlberg(中国大堂建筑师)和Robert Welch(John Birch Society的创始人)。通过在精英领导人和基层领导人之间进行交替,这种叙事表明了“亚洲第一”建立的联系,并转化为一个团结,并最终在1964年GOP大会(第五章的主题)上提名了Barry Goldwater的总统候选人。夏威夷建国辩论;它试图表明保守主义国际主义中的裂痕,特别是右翼在冷战期间通过国内种族歧视解决国外大笔资金的困难。

著录项

  • 作者

    Mao, Joyce.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Berkeley.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Berkeley.;
  • 学科 American Studies.; History United States.; Political Science International Law and Relations.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 268 p.
  • 总页数 268
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 美洲史;国际法;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号