首页> 外文学位 >The effects of aligned developmental feedback on third-grade students' performance in overhand throw for force.
【24h】

The effects of aligned developmental feedback on third-grade students' performance in overhand throw for force.

机译:一致的发展反馈对三年级学生举手投掷中表现的影响。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study examined the influence of aligned developmental feedback (ADFB) on student performance of the overhand throw for force in a naturalistic physical education setting, including possible gender differences. The second objective was to determine whether teacher professional development improved content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in throwing and the teacher's ability to deliver ADFB. Participants (n=97) were from four 3rd-grade classes, each randomly assigned to a comparison or experimental group. Both groups received 80 min of throwing practice during seven throwing sessions. Mean body component levels for the step, trunk, humerus and forearm and mean ball velocity scores were calculated from the five throwing trials at the pretest, posttest, and retention test. During Phase 1 the teacher delivered seven sessions of throwing to the comparison group (n=49) using his own feedback but standardized throwing lesson plans. During Phase 2, the teacher was trained to deliver ADFB and teacher feedback was recorded during each session using the ADFB observation system. In Phase 3 the teacher delivered the same seven throwing lesson plans as Phase 1 to the experimental group (n=48), but with the provision of ADFB. An ANOVA revealed significant differences in ADFB between the groups with the experimental group receiving significantly greater ADFB than the comparison group demonstrating the impact of the teacher professional development training. A 2 Group X 2 Gender ANOVA with repeated measures revealed a non-significant Group effect in pretest ball velocity scores (p=.374) but a significant Gender effect (p.001). A 2 Group X 2 Time X 2 Gender ANOVA with repeated measures on ball velocity scores revealed a significant Group X Time interaction (p=.020) from pretest to posttest with the experimental group significantly better than the comparison group in ball velocity across the intervention. A 2 Group X 2 Gender multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) on body component scores revealed a non-significant Group effect (p=.361) revealing no significant differences between the groups in the body components at the pretest. A significant multivariate Group X Time interaction (p=.001) was found indicating groups differed over time. Follow-up univariate analyses revealed a significant Group X Time interaction for only the humerus body component. The posthoc paired-sample t-tests revealed that both the experimental and comparison groups improved significantly from pretest to posttest on the step component ( p=.001) and the humerus component (p=.002). However, the experimental group also improved significantly from pretest to posttest in the forearm component (p=.002). Separate post-hoc 2 Group X 2 Gender ANOVAs on the posttest scores revealed a significant Group effect for the step (p.001) and humerus components ( p.001) with the experimental group better than the comparison group. Gender differences were present in the body components at the pretest regardless of group (p.001), these differences were maintained throughout the posttest and retention test. Effects at the end of the intervention maintained throughout retention for both groups in body components and velocity scores. The findings demonstrate the importance of ADFB in the learning process and how such feedback can enhance a student's performance on the overhand throw.
机译:这项研究研究了在自然主义的体育教育环境中,一致的发育反馈(ADFB)对学生举手投掷成绩的影响,包括可能的性别差异。第二个目标是确定教师的专业发展是否提高了投掷中的内容知识和教学内容知识,以及教师提供ADFB的能力。参加者(n = 97)来自四个3年级班级,每个班级随机分配给比较组或实验组。两组在七次投掷比赛中均接受了80分钟的投掷练习。在前测,后测和retention留测试中,通过五次投掷试验计算出了脚步,躯干,肱骨和前臂的平均身体成分水平以及平均球速得分。在第一阶段中,老师根据自己的反馈但标准化的摔跤课程计划,向比较组(n = 49)进行了七次摔球。在第2阶段中,对教师进行了培训,使他们能够交付ADFB,并且在每次会议中都使用ADFB观察系统记录教师的反馈。在第3阶段,老师向实验小组(n = 48)交付了与第1阶段相同的七个投掷课程计划,但提供了ADFB。方差分析显示各组之间ADFB的显着差异,实验组的ADFB明显高于对照组,这说明了教师专业发展培训的影响。重复测量的2组X 2性别方差分析显示,预测球速得分中的组效应不显着(p = .374),但性别显着性显着(p <.001)。重复测量球速得分的A 2组X 2时间X 2性别方差分析显示,从测试前到测试后,X组的时间交互作用显着(p = .020),实验组在整个干预期间的球速明显优于对照组。 A 2组X 2性别成分得分的性别多变量方差分析(MANOVA)显示出非显着的组效应(p = .361),表明在预测试时各组身体成分之间无显着差异。发现显着的多元X组时间交互作用(p = .001),表明各组随时间变化。后续单变量分析显示,仅肱骨成分具有显着的X组时间相互作用。事后配对样本t检验显示,实验组和对照组在步测分量(p = .001)和肱骨分量(p = .002)的测试前到测试后都有显着改善。但是,从前测到后测,实验组的前臂部位也有明显改善(p = .002)。事后测试的单独事后2组X 2性别方差分析显示,踏步(p <.001)和肱骨组件(p <.001)的显着组效应,实验组优于对照组。无论组别如何,在预测试时身体成分中都存在性别差异(p <.001),这些差异在整个后测试和保留测试中均得以保持。干预结束时,两组患者的身体成分和速度得分均保持不变。研究结果证明了ADFB在学习过程中的重要性,以及这种反馈如何提高学生的超投能力。

著录项

  • 作者

    Cohen, Rona.;

  • 作者单位

    The Ohio State University.;

  • 授予单位 The Ohio State University.;
  • 学科 Education Physical.; Education Elementary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 220 p.
  • 总页数 220
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 初等教育;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号