首页> 外文学位 >Jesus, the glutton: A rhetorical-historical analysis of Mark 2:13--22.
【24h】

Jesus, the glutton: A rhetorical-historical analysis of Mark 2:13--22.

机译:贪吃的耶稣:对马可福音2:13--22的修辞历史分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study is a rhetorical-historical analysis of Mark 2:13-22. Our aim is to isolate the audience, constraints, and primary exigence of Mark's presentation, as well as the origin and development of his source material. The following questions are pursued: Why did Jesus eat with "sinners"? Why are his disciples not fasting? And why do these issues comprise a single rhetorical unit? Tentative answers require an investigation into the ideological background of the interlocutors, the "disciples of the Pharisees." Is Jesus intentionally challenging the Pharisees and John the Baptist concerning these issues? If so, what impact did such protests have on his Galilean ministry?;Our study concludes that the apostle Peter is responsible for the form ("conflict anecdote") and content of the presentation. Peter may have formulated the tradition to justify his own table fellowship with repentant sinners during and after Jesus' ministry. All the elements of the presentation are historically plausible, and there is little evidence of Markan redaction. The interlocutors are local scribes, who followed the interpretations of Pharisaic teachers in Jerusalem. The Pharisees taught their disciples to fast twice a week for the forgiveness of minor sins, in part, so that they could celebrate the Sabbath meal in moral purity. Sinners---those who willfully and habitually break God's law---were excluded from the table fellowship.;Jesus claimed to have authority to forgive sins, which allowed him to share a table with those who believed his message. He interpreted such meals as the inauguration of the Messianic Wedding Banquet; forgiven sinners represented the reconciliation taking place between God and his wayward bride, Israel. In response to this outpouring of eschatological forgiveness, fasting would be entirely inappropriate.;These actions isolated Jesus and his followers from the disciples of John the Baptist, who apparently rejected Jesus' already/not yet eschatology and his offer of forgiveness prior to judgment. The Pharisees, who were the most powerful religious group in Galilee, were able, through their network of local supporters, to turn many "righteous" Galileans---the synagogue-going crowd---against Jesus, dismissing him as a glutton.
机译:这项研究是对马可福音2:13-22的修辞历史分析。我们的目的是隔离Mark演讲的听众,约束和主要需求,以及他的原始资料的起源和发展。追问以下问题:耶稣为什么与“罪人”一起吃饭?他的门徒为什么不禁食?为什么这些问题只包含一个修辞单元?初步的答案需要调查对话者的思想背景,即“法利赛人的门徒”。耶稣是否有意就这些问题挑战法利赛人和施洗约翰?如果是这样,这种抗议对他的伽利略事工有什么影响?;我们的研究得出的结论是,使徒彼得负责陈述的形式(“冲突轶事”)和内容。彼得可能已经制定了传统,以证明自己在耶稣事奉期间和之后与悔改的罪人同桌同伴是合理的。演示文稿的所有元素在历史上都是合理的,并且几乎没有Markan编辑的证据。对话者是当地的文士,他们遵循耶路撒冷对法利赛语教师的解释。法利赛人教他们的门徒每周两次禁食,以减轻轻微的罪过,部分原因是为了使他们可以在道德上纯洁地庆祝安息日。罪人-那些故意和习惯性地违反上帝律法的人-被排除在餐桌团契之外;耶稣声称有权宽恕罪恶,这使他可以与那些相信他的信息的人分享餐桌。他把这些饭菜解释为弥赛亚婚礼宴会的就职典礼。被宽恕的罪人代表上帝与他任性的新娘以色列之间的和解。为了应对这种末世的宽恕,禁食是完全不适当的;这些行动将耶稣及其信徒与施洗约翰的门徒隔离开来,后者显然拒绝了耶稣已经/尚未的末世论和他在判决之前的宽恕。法利赛人是加利利最强大的宗教团体,他们能够通过他们的当地支持者网络,使许多“正义的”加利利人-犹太会堂聚会的群众-反对耶稣,将他视为a嘴。

著录项

  • 作者

    DelHousaye, John.;

  • 作者单位

    Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Theology.;

  • 授予单位 Fuller Theological Seminary, School of Theology.;
  • 学科 Religion Biblical Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 281 p.
  • 总页数 281
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号