首页> 外文学位 >Transboundary groundwater: Geopolitical consequences, commons sense, and the Law of the Hidden Sea.
【24h】

Transboundary groundwater: Geopolitical consequences, commons sense, and the Law of the Hidden Sea.

机译:跨界地下水:地缘政治后果,常识和暗海法则。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

With 97% of the world's freshwater resources stored underground, the connection between groundwater resources to the metrics of space, scale and time common to the geographic study of natural resources has not been extensively investigated by geographers. While nearly 240 transboundary aquifers are mapped across the world, a potential "tragedy" is brewing due to the poorly structured institutional capacity built within river basin treaties and agreements and River Basin Organizations to accommodate the management and governance of these transboundary aquifers. Regimes to manage or govern groundwater remain weak. On the basis of a survey of 400 freshwater treaties and agreements completed as part of this study, about 15% include provisions for groundwater. Very few of the treaties and agreements address transboundary aquifers, the coastal aquifer systems which serve as the water supplies to an increasing number of mega cities with populations exceeding 10 million people, the types of aquifers that store groundwater and respond differently to intensive exploitation, or the three dimensional boundaries of the resource or user domains. Recognized as a common pool resource, groundwater resources serve as an example of a "pure" common pool resource. This is because of the difficulty in excluding users and because of the subtractability of the resource as groundwater is pumped or artificially drained from the subsurface. Yet the management and governance of groundwater resources is challenging and increasingly conflictive not only due to its hidden nature, but also because of the difficulty in placing boundaries around the groundwater resources and user domains. These domain boundaries are three dimensional and change with time. Drawing these domain boundaries is supremely political and morph with changing social and cultural values. The present work incorporates an interdisciplinarity and broad systems approach to explore the geography of groundwater to provide context to an inventory of global groundwater resources and user domains. On the basis of surveys of international law and national policies focusing on groundwater, a previously unrecognized typology was derived for the boundaries for groundwater resources and user domains. This work found that (1) traditional approaches to defining groundwater domains focus on predevelopment conditions, referred to herein as a bona-fide "commons" boundary; (2) groundwater development creates human-caused or fiat "hydrocommons" boundary where hydrology and hydraulics are meshed, and (3) the social and cultural values of groundwater users define a fiat "commons heritage" boundary acknowledging that groundwater resources are part of the "common heritage of humankind". The significance of this typology is that it is difficult to aggregate demographic, social, and economic data within specific boundaries for groundwater resources for detailed geographic analyses, much less develop international regimes, without agreement on the fundamental unit of analysis. Given the complexity of the geologic and political setting of global groundwater resources, a new paradigm of "post-sovereign governance" was examined as part of this study to assess the applicability of global groundwater governance as opposed to international regimes, including the recognition of the geographic overlap between groundwater and ocean resources through an evaluation of the applicability of a law of the sea model for multilateral collaboration regarding groundwater resources through the Law of the Hidden Sea.
机译:由于全球97%的淡水资源都存储在地下,因此地理学家尚未广泛研究地下水与自然资源地理研究中常用的空间,规模和时间之间的联系。尽管在世界范围内绘制了近240个跨界含水层,但由于流域条约和协定以及流域组织内部为适应这些跨界含水层的管理和治理而建立的结构性机构能力很差,潜在的“悲剧”正在酝酿之中。管理或治理地下水的制度仍然薄弱。根据对400份淡水条约和协议的调查(作为本研究的一部分),约有15%包含了地下水储备。很少有条约和协议涉及跨界含水层,为越来越多人口超过一千万的大城市提供水源的沿海含水层系统,存储地下水并对集约化开发做出不同反应的含水层类型,或者资源或用户域的三维边界。公认的公共池资源是地下水,是“纯”公共池资源的一个例子。这是因为难以排除用户,并且由于从地下泵送或人工抽取地下水时资源的可减去性。然而,地下水资源的管理和治理具有挑战性,并且越来越具有冲突性,这不仅是由于其隐藏的性质,而且还因为难以在地下水资源和用户域周围设置边界。这些域边界是三维的,并随时间变化。划定这些领域的界限是政治上的,并且随着社会和文化价值的变化而变化。本工作结合了跨学科和广泛的系统方法来探索地下水的地理环境,从而为全球地下水资源和用户领域清单提供背景。根据对地下水的国际法和国家政策的调查,得出了以前无法识别的地下水资源和用户域边界类型。这项工作发现(1)定义地下水域的传统方法侧重于开发前条件,在本文中称为善意的“公共”边界; (2)地下水开发在水文和水力学之间建立了人为或法定的“水文界”边界,并且(3)地下水使用者的社会和文化价值定义了法定的“公共遗产”界线,承认地下水资源是水文的一部分。 “人类的共同遗产”。这种类型的重要性在于,在没有就基本分析单位达成共识的情况下,很难在特定边界内汇总地下水资源的特定人口统计,社会和经济数据以进行详细的地理分析,更不用说发展国际制度了。考虑到全球地下水资源的地质和政治环境的复杂性,作为本研究的一部分,研究了一种新的“主权后治理”范式,以评估全球地下水治理与国际制度相对的适用性,包括对国际制度的认可。通过评估海洋法模型是否适用于通过隐藏海法进行的有关地下水资源的多边合作来评估地下水和海洋资源之间的地理重叠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号