首页> 外文学位 >Between- and within-group health disparities: Determinants across race/ethnicity and regions in the U.S.
【24h】

Between- and within-group health disparities: Determinants across race/ethnicity and regions in the U.S.

机译:组间和组内健康差异:美国种族/民族和地区的决定因素

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Eliminating health disparities among segments of the population is one of the two goals of Healthy People 2010 - the United State national statement on health objectives. Achieving the goals needs effective public policies that require precise and consistent measures of quality of health and health inequalities. Following recent developments in measuring quality of health and health inequality, we use self-assessed health status conditioned by several objective determinants as a comprehensive measure of individual quality of health. The individual quality of health is used to measure health inequality between and within racial/ethnic groups of the U.S. population as well as within states. In addition, we also measure quality of health and health inequality between and within groups of a smaller population, which is the New York State population and across 17 geographic areas of New York State.; As different groups have different demographic and socioeconomic characteristics, the causes of health inequality within groups may vary. Decomposition analysis is conducted to determine the contribution of each factor to health inequality between and within racial/ethnic groups.; An index of individual health is estimated based on self-assessed health status conditioned by several objective determinants including different diseases/risk factors and socio-demographic characteristics in an ordered Probit framework, in which the threshold parameters are scaled to control for heterogeneity. Based on the index, three types of health inequality---total health inequality, income-related health inequality, and racial/ethnic inequality in health---are calculated using Gini coefficient, concentration index, and disparity index, respectively. In addition, Health Adjusted Life Expectancy is also computed based on the estimated health index and U.S. life tables. The presence of health inequality is not only between groups or states but also within groups or states. The Inequalities are particularly high within groups or states with low quality of health. American Indian/Alaskan Natives have the lowest quality of health as well as the highest total and income-related health inequalities; and Kentucky and West Virginia have the lowest quality of health and the highest health inequalities.; For policy purposes, it is important to distinguish the sources of health inequality between and within groups of the population. Health disparities between non-Hispanic Withes and other minority groups are decomposed into socio-demographic factors, and so do the total and income-related health inequalities within each group.; Whereas 72% of health disparity between non-Hispanic Whites and Blacks is attributable to the inferior endowments of Blacks, it is only 50% for Hispanics compared Whites. On average Asians have better health than Whites, but this is mainly due to better endowments (Asians are much younger in the sample); however, the coefficient estimates favor Whites. For American Indians and Alaskan Natives (AIANs), endowments account for 65% in favor of Whites. Interestingly, the intercept contributes 28% to the disparity in favor of AIANs, suggesting the efficacy of various socio-economic programs sponsored by US Government to improve the quality of health of AIANs.; The strongest factors contributing to within-groups health inequalities are employment, education, income, and age. The contribution of each of these factors varies considerably among racial/ethnic groups. For example, employment is the strongest factor contributing to total health inequality within AIANs and Blacks, but within Hispanics income and education are the most important factors.; Using the same methods as presented in chapter 2, we study quality of health, total health inequality, income-related health inequality within each of racial/ethnic groups as well as across 17 geographic areas of New York State. American Indian/Alaskan Natives and Hispanics are found to do the worst. Inter
机译:消除部分人群之间的健康差异是《 2010年健康人群》的两个目标之一-美国关于健康目标的国家声明。要实现这些目标,就需要有效的公共政策,这些政策需要对健康质量和健康不平等状况进行精确,一致的衡量。在衡量健康质量和健康不平等方面的最新发展之后,我们将自我评估的健康状况(以几个客观决定因素为条件)用作个人健康质量的综合衡量指标。个体健康质量用于衡量美国人口中种族/族裔之间以及之内以及各州之间的健康不平等。此外,我们还测量了较小人群(纽约州人口)和纽约州17个地理区域之间的健康状况和健康不平等状况。由于不同的人群具有不同的人口统计学和社会经济特征,因此人群内部健康不平等的原因可能有所不同。进行分解分析,以确定每个因素对种族/族裔群体之间以及内部的健康不平等的影响。基于有序客观Probit框架中的几个客观决定因素(包括不同的疾病/风险因素和社会人口统计学特征),根据自我评估的健康状况,估算个人健康指数,在该框架中,对阈值参数进行缩放以控制异质性。根据该指数,分别使用基尼系数,集中度指数和差异指数计算三种类型的健康不平等-总体健康不平等,与收入相关的健康不平等和种族/民族不平等。此外,还会根据估算的健康指数和美国寿命表来计算“健康调整后的预期寿命”。健康不平等的存在不仅存在于群体或州之间,而且还存在于群体或州内。在健康质量低下的团体或州中,不平等现象尤其严重。美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加土著人的医疗质量最低,而与健康和收入相关的收入不平等最高;肯塔基州和西弗吉尼亚州的医疗质量最低,医疗不平等程度最高。出于政策目的,重要的是区分人群之间以及人群内部的健康不平等根源。非西班牙裔威斯人与其他少数族裔之间的健康差异被分解为社会人口统计学因素,每组内部的总和与收入相关的健康不平等现象也被分解。非西班牙裔白人与黑人之间72%的健康差异是由于黑人的劣势造成的,而西班牙裔美国人与白人相比仅占50%。平均而言,亚洲人的健康状况要好于白人,但这主要归因于天赋的提高(样本中的亚洲人要年轻得多)。但是,系数估计偏向于怀特。对于美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加土著人(AIAN),end赋占白人的65%。有趣的是,截取事件对AIAN的支持造成了28%的差异,这表明美国政府发起的各种社会经济计划对提高AIAN的健康质量的功效。导致组内健康不平等的最主要因素是就业,教育,收入和年龄。在种族/族裔群体中,每个因素的贡献差异很大。例如,就业是造成AIAN和黑人整体健康不平等的最重要因素,但在西班牙裔美国人中,收入和教育是最重要的因素。使用与第2章中介绍的方法相同的方法,我们研究了每个种族/族裔群体以及纽约州17个地理区域内的健康质量,总健康不平等,与收入相关的健康不平等。发现美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加土著人和西班牙裔人做得最糟。国米

著录项

  • 作者

    Pulungan, Zulkarnain.;

  • 作者单位

    State University of New York at Albany.;

  • 授予单位 State University of New York at Albany.;
  • 学科 Economics General.; Health Sciences Public Health.; Sociology Ethnic and Racial Studies.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 142 p.
  • 总页数 142
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 经济学;预防医学、卫生学;民族学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号