首页> 外文学位 >How methods and technology instructors think about good practice: An exploration for transforming pre-service curriculum.
【24h】

How methods and technology instructors think about good practice: An exploration for transforming pre-service curriculum.

机译:方法和技术教员如何考虑良好实践:变革职前课程的探索。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This descriptive case study investigates four research questions: (1) the similarities and differences between experienced methods and technology instructors' thinking about good practice, (2) their perception of technology use in teaching, (3) their thinking about integrating teaching methods and integrating technology, and (4) the discrepancy between their espoused theory and theory-in-use. To answer the questions, multiple data were collected using four methods, including: (A) an open-ended interview, (B) an interview with the Rep Grid technique, (C) a concept map drawing and (D) a final reflection. The data were analyzed through content and cluster analysis.; The results indicate that there are some similarities and differences between experienced methods instructors and experienced technology instructors. Methods and technology instructors have similar definitions about good practice in teaching, apply similar teaching strategies in their teaching, and have similar perceptions of the role of computer technology in teaching. In terms of differences, methods instructors tend to be more focused on critical and higher-order thinking skills and topic-oriented issues related to their background (Social Studies). In addition, they have some difficulty and frustration with technology use. In other words, they focus on content first and then what technology to use afterwards. Technology instructors are more interested in applying a variety of pedagogical strategies and taking a student-centered approach in a hands-on/project-oriented technology learning environment but without a strong focus on any particular content. Lacking content constitutes a dilemma and perhaps a substantial disadvantage for technology instructors because it forces them to accept all content when trying to advocate for technology into their students' teaching. As a result, integration can become a superficial issue.; These similarities and differences between the methods and technology instructors are useful in that they can help find better ways to improve teaching performance and hopefully reach the goal of substantive technology integration.
机译:这个描述性案例研究调查了四个研究问题:(1)经验丰富的方法与技术教师的良好实践思想之间的异同;(2)他们对技术在教学中的使用的感知;(3)他们关于整合教学方法和整合的思想技术;以及(4)他们拥护的理论与使用中的理论之间的差异。为了回答这些问题,使用四种方法收集了多个数据,包括:(A)开放式访谈,(B)Rep Grid技术的访谈,(C)概念图,以及(D)最后的反思。通过内容和聚类分析对数据进行分析。结果表明,经验丰富的方法指导者和经验丰富的技术指导者之间存在一些异同。方法和技术教员对教学中的良好实践有相似的定义,在教学中采用相似的教学策略,并对计算机技术在教学中的作用也有相似的认识。在差异方面,方法讲师倾向于将重点更多地放在批判性和更高层次的思维技能以及与他们的背景相关的面向主题的问题上(社会研究)。此外,他们对技术的使用也有一些困难和沮丧。换句话说,他们首先关注内容,然后关注什么技术。技术讲师对应用各种教学策略和在以动手/项目为导向的技术学习环境中采取以学生为中心的方法更感兴趣,但没有将重点放在任何特定内容上。缺乏内容构成了技术指导者的两难选择,并且可能是一个实质性的劣势,因为当试图在学生的教学中倡导技术时,这迫使他们接受所有内容。结果,集成可能成为一个表面问题。这些方法和技术指导者之间的这些异同是有用的,因为它们可以帮助找到更好的方法来提高教学效果,并有望实现实质性技术集成的目标。

著录项

  • 作者

    Sung, Li-chu.;

  • 作者单位

    Indiana University.;

  • 授予单位 Indiana University.;
  • 学科 Education Technology.; Education Teacher Training.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2006
  • 页码 230 p.
  • 总页数 230
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 教师;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号