首页> 外文学位 >A cultural perspective on writing evaluation of Korean, English-Language-Learning children.
【24h】

A cultural perspective on writing evaluation of Korean, English-Language-Learning children.

机译:朝鲜语,英语学习儿童写作评估的文化视角。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) rubric, which is a standard rubric used by most of the states in the U.S., evaluates children's narrative writing based on grammar, organization, vocabulary, word choice, etc. However, the NAEP rubric and evaluation methods used by many states do not consider narrative traits when assessing writing. In order to ensure valid evaluation of children's narrative writing worldwide, it seems desirable to find a means to evaluate "narrative" qualities that arise from children's different cultural backgrounds.;The present study examined ratings of 90 written stories, with and without consideration of narrative traits, such as morals of stories and characters' emotions. Participants were 30 monolingual English-speaking (ME), 30 Korean English-Language-Learning (ELL), and 30 monolingual Korean-speaking (MK) children, who wrote one story each. The NAEP rubric was modified to include these narrative traits, and any changes in the scores were analyzed when both the NAEP and the modified rubrics were used to evaluate the children's narrative writing.;Primary results indicated that children in the three groups did not earn higher scores for their written stories when scored with the modified rubric. The lack of significant differences between ratings assigned with the two rubrics within each group suggests that the modified rubric does not favor a certain group nor result in better performance for participants as a whole, which shows that the addition of narrative components in the evaluation did not cause any "harm". When correlations were examined between frequency counts of narrative traits and writing performance with the two rubrics, it was found that MK children with limited English proficiency were still able to express morals of stories and characters' emotions.;In summary, the results of this study suggest that including narrative traits in writing evaluations still lead to valid assessment of children's narrative writing. Consequently, children may tend to develop writing skills at the expense of narrative ones. In order to promote development of narrative skills at an early age, inclusion of narrative measures, such as the ones in the present study, may be important to standardized assessment of children's narrative writing.
机译:国家教育进步评估(NAEP)专栏是美国大多数州使用的标准专栏,它根据语法,组织,词汇,单词选择等评估儿童的叙述写作。但是,NAEP专栏和评估许多州使用的方法在评估写作时都不会考虑叙事特征。为了确保对全世界儿童叙事作品进行有效评估,似乎希望找到一种方法来评估因儿童不同文化背景而产生的“叙事”品质。本研究调查了90种书面故事的评级,并考虑了是否考虑了叙事特质,例如故事道德和人物情感。参加者有30个单语英语(ME),30个韩语英语学习(ELL)和30个单语朝鲜语(MK)儿童,他们每个都写一个故事。对NAEP的表述进行了修改以包括这些叙事特征,并且在将NAEP和经修改的表述都用于评估儿童的叙事写作时,对得分的任何变化进行了分析;主要结果表明,三组儿童的收入并未提高用修改后的标题评分时,他们的书面故事会得分。每组中两个主题的评分之间没有显着差异,这表明修改后的主题既不适合某个群体,也不会对整体参与者产生更好的表现,这表明评估中没有添加叙述性成分造成任何“伤害”。通过对两种语言的叙事特征的频率计数与写作表现之间的相关性进行调查,发现英语水平有限的MK儿童仍然能够表达故事和人物情感的道德。认为在写作评估中包括叙事特征仍然可以有效评估儿童的叙事写作。因此,儿童可能会倾向于牺牲叙事技巧来发展写作技巧。为了促进幼儿叙事技巧的发展,纳入叙事措施(例如本研究中的措施)对于标准化儿童叙事写作的评估可能很重要。

著录项

  • 作者

    Kim, Huai-Rhin.;

  • 作者单位

    University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;

  • 授予单位 University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.;
  • 学科 Education Language and Literature.;Education Bilingual and Multicultural.;Education Tests and Measurements.;Health Sciences Speech Pathology.;Education Curriculum and Instruction.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 202 p.
  • 总页数 202
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:31

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号