首页> 外文学位 >After aesthetics: Martin Heidegger and the end of art.
【24h】

After aesthetics: Martin Heidegger and the end of art.

机译:追求美学之后:马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger)和艺术的终结。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The dissertation offers an interpretation and defense of Heidegger's thinking on art, in light of his endorsement of the "end of art" thesis; the thesis that art is over because it has lost its traditional significance. The dissertation attempts to answer the question, "what sort of philosophical treatment of art is consistent both with Heidegger's criticisms of traditional philosophy and his version of the end of art thesis?" The dissertation argues that, unlike Hegel's classic formulation and Arthur Danto's contemporary reinterpretation, Heidegger's endorsement of the thesis entails not a philosophical disenfranchisement of art, but rather a reassessment of philosophical aesthetics, so as to allow art a future. Taking Heidegger's endorsement of the end of art seriously makes clear that he cannot have a philosophy of art in the traditional sense, since such an enterprise would be in conflict with his own recommendations for philosophy.; The starting point of my argument is the apparent contradiction in "The Origin of the Work of Art" between the account of art as a "happening of truth" and Heidegger's surprising acceptance of Hegel's end of art thesis in the afterword. Two central questions emerge from this apparent conflict: first, does Heidegger have a general philosophical account of art? And second, is traditional aesthetics legitimate? According to Heidegger, the end of art derives not from art as such, but from philosophy's appropriation of art. This makes Heidegger grow increasingly wary of philosophy's tendency to subordinate art through aesthetics. Given this wariness, Heidegger's mature thinking on art aims, the dissertation argues, at a philosophical encounter with art that is neither systematic nor disenfranchising. Art can be a genuine resource for philosophical thought, though philosophy cannot determine the nature of art in advance. The dissertation concludes by surveying Heidegger's reflections on the modernist art of Cezanne, Klee and Chillida as examples of genuinely philosophical encounters with art.
机译:鉴于海德格尔对“艺术终结”理论的认可,本文对海德格尔的艺术思想进行了解释和辩护。艺术已经结束,因为它已经失去了传统意义。论文试图回答这样一个问题:“对海德格尔对传统哲学的批评以及对海德格尔的艺术论点的批判,对艺术的哲学处理是什么样的?”论文认为,与黑格尔的经典表述和亚瑟·丹托的当代重新诠释不同,海德格尔对论文的认可不是对哲学的哲学剥夺,而是对哲学美学的重新评估,以使艺术成为未来。认真对待海德格尔对艺术终结的认可表明,他不能拥有传统意义上的艺术哲学,因为这样的事业将与他自己对哲学的建议相冲突。我的观点的出发点是在“艺术作品的起源”中明显的矛盾,即以艺术为“真相的发生”的说法与海德格尔在后言中惊人地接受黑格尔关于艺术论点的终结。这种明显的冲突产生了两个中心问题:首先,海德格尔对艺术有普遍的哲学解释吗?其次,传统美学是否合法?根据海德格尔的说法,艺术的终结不是源于这样的艺术,而是源于哲学对艺术的挪用。这使海德格尔越来越警惕哲学通过美学从属艺术的倾向。鉴于这种警惕,海德格尔关于艺术目标的成熟思想在论文的艺术哲学探讨中既没有系统性也没有剥夺权利。尽管哲学无法预先确定艺术的本质,但艺术可以成为哲学思想的真正资源。论文的结尾是考察海德格尔对塞尚,克莱和奇利达的现代主义艺术的反思,以此作为与艺术的真正哲学相遇的例子。

著录项

  • 作者

    Torsen, Ingvild.;

  • 作者单位

    Boston University.;

  • 授予单位 Boston University.;
  • 学科 Fine Arts.; Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 219 p.
  • 总页数 219
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 艺术;哲学理论;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号