首页> 外文学位 >Transport policies, travel behavior, and sustainability: A comparison of Germany and the U.S.
【24h】

Transport policies, travel behavior, and sustainability: A comparison of Germany and the U.S.

机译:运输政策,旅行行为和可持续性:德国和美国的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This dissertation investigates the influence of transport policies on individual travel behavior in Germany and the U.S. In spite of increasing automobile use in both countries, Germany has been more successful than the U.S. in maintaining a more balanced, sustainable transport system. In 2002, Americans drove 125 percent more kilometers per capita than Germans. Walking, cycling, and public transport accounted for only 14 percent of all trips in the U.S., compared to 40 percent in Germany. Excessive reliance on the car is responsible for unsustainable trends such as environmental pollution, oil dependence, obesity, traffic congestion, and road fatalities. In 2005, urban transport energy use and CO2 emissions per capita were three times higher in the U.S. than in Germany.;This analysis contains two parts capturing the interdependencies of transportation policies and individual travel decisions. A descriptive and qualitative examination of differences in travel trends and transport policies over time sets the frameworks within which individuals make daily travel choices in each country. A multivariate analysis based on two comparable national travel surveys then explores the intricacies of these choices.;The analysis shows that policies and institutions in the U.S. contribute to making car use cheaper, easier, and more common than in Germany. In 2005, for example, revenues from roadway user taxes and fees in Germany were 2.6 times larger than roadway expenditures by all levels of government, compared to net subsidies for roadways in the U.S. Unlike the majority of American cities, most German municipalities promote non-automobile travel and impose restrictions on driving, thus making car travel slower and less attractive. In 2002, average car travel speeds in the U.S. were 33 percent faster than in Germany. Multivariate analyses showed that transportation policies accounted for up to 25 percent of the variability explained in travel behavior.;Several policy recommendations follow from this research. First, higher population density, a greater mix of land uses, access to public transportation, and higher gasoline prices reduce car travel. Second, higher car-ownership rates and faster average car travel speeds increase car use. Lastly, the combination of car-restrictive policies with measures that increase the attractiveness of non-automobile modes has been key to more limited car use in Germany.
机译:本文研究了交通政策对德国和美国个人出行行为的影响。尽管两国的汽车使用量都在增加,但德国在维持更加平衡,可持续的交通系统方面比美国更成功。 2002年,美国人的人均行驶里程比德国人多125%。步行,骑自行车和公共交通工具仅占美国所有出行的14%,而德国只有40%。过度依赖汽车是造成不可持续趋势的原因,例如环境污染,石油依赖,肥胖,交通拥堵和道路交通事故。 2005年,美国城市交通能源使用量和人均二氧化碳排放量是德国的三倍;该分析包含两个部分,这些内容反映了交通政策与个人出行决定之间的相互依存关系。对旅行趋势和交通政策随时间变化的差异进行描述性和定性检查,确定了个人在每个国家做出日常旅行选择的框架。然后,基于两次可比较的全国旅行调查进行的多元分析,探讨了这些选择的复杂性。该分析表明,美国的政策和机构比德国更便宜,更容易且更普遍地使用汽车。例如,2005年,德国的道路使用者税费收入是各级政府的道路支出的2.6倍,而美国的道路净补贴额却是美国的两倍。与大多数美国城市不同,大多数德国城市都倡导非道路使用汽车旅行并限制了驾驶,因此使汽车旅行变慢且吸引力降低。 2002年,美国的平均汽车行驶速度比德国快33%。多变量分析表明,交通政策占出行行为中所解释的差异的25%。;这项研究提出了一些政策建议。首先,较高的人口密度,更多的土地用途,更多的公共交通以及较高的汽油价格减少了汽车旅行。其次,更高的购车率和更快的平均汽车行驶速度会增加汽车的使用量。最后,在德国限制使用汽车的政策与增加非汽车模式吸引力的措施相结合,已成为限制汽车使用的关键。

著录项

  • 作者

    Buehler, Ralph.;

  • 作者单位

    Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;

  • 授予单位 Rutgers The State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick.;
  • 学科 Transportation.;Urban and Regional Planning.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 522 p.
  • 总页数 522
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 综合运输;区域规划、城乡规划;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:39:15

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号