首页> 外文学位 >The effects of Catholic high school education: A systematic and historical analysis of the search for evidence.
【24h】

The effects of Catholic high school education: A systematic and historical analysis of the search for evidence.

机译:天主教高中教育的影响:对证据寻找的系统和历史分析。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

There is a body of social science research claiming that the Catholic high school produces a superior education for its students in comparison with the public ones. That research began in 1982 and 1987 in studies by the renowned James S. Coleman of the University of Chicago and in independent but related work by Andrew M. Greeley, also at the University of Chicago (the National Opinion Research Center). Working with statistical data from national data sets, they both claimed that Catholic high schools demonstrated an academic advantage in both test scores (verbal and mathematical) and lifetime accomplishments (such as graduation from high school and completion of further education) for their students, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds.;This body of research was completed in 1993 by the work of Anthony S. Bryk who reaffirmed Coleman's and Greeley's claim for an academic advantage from attendance at the Catholic high school. Bryk also explained the reason for this advantage through new data that isolated several explanatory factors from a special in-person study of seven carefully selected Catholic high schools.;That research conclusion was hotly contested from the 1982 first efforts by Coleman and Greeley through Bryk's 1993 reaffirmation and explanation. The central complaint against the Coleman-Greeley-Bryk effort concerned selection bias, conceding the evidence of better performance in the data but denying the claim by these three researchers that it was an actual effect from the working of the Catholic high school and countering that the better performance was a selection factor from the type of students attending Catholic high schools rather than public ones.;Looking at all of this controversy from the point of view of history and through a special systematic analysis, this study has attempted to understand better the conflicting claims in the scientific research as a first step toward suggesting, in the final discussion, whether any further research could settle the controversies and if so, what that research should be. The study concludes that further studies are needed, especially ones examining the religious motivations of the parents sending students to the Catholic high school.
机译:社会科学研究的一个机构声称,天主教公立中学的学生比公立中学拥有更高的教育水平。该研究始于1982年和1987年,由芝加哥大学的著名詹姆斯·科尔曼(James S. Coleman)进行研究,并由芝加哥大学(国家舆论研究中心)的安德鲁·格里利(Andrew M. Greeley)独立但相关地开展。他们利用国家数据集的统计数据,都声称天主教高中在其学生的考试成绩(语言和数学)和终身成就(例如高中毕业和完成学历)方面均表现出学术优势。这些研究是由安东尼·布莱克(Anthony S. Bryk)的工作于1993年完成的,安东尼·布莱克(Anthony S. Bryk)重申了科尔曼(Coleman)和格里利(Greeley)关于从天主教高中就读获得学术优势的主张。布莱克还通过新数据解释了这一优势的原因,该数据从对七家精心挑选的天主教中学进行的特殊亲自研究中分离出几个解释性因素;该研究结论受到了科尔曼和格里利在1982年的首次努力直到布莱克1993年的强烈质疑。重申和解释。对Coleman-Greeley-Bryk努力的主要抱怨涉及选择偏见,承认数据中表现更好的证据,但否认这三位研究人员声称这是天主教高中工作的实际结果,并反对更好的成绩是从天主教高中而不是公立高中学习的学生中选择的一个因素。;从历史的角度并通过特殊的系统分析来研究所有争议,本研究试图更好地理解这种冲突。在最终的讨论中,建议在科学研究中提出建议是迈出第一步,即是否有任何进一步的研究可以解决争议,如果可以,那么该研究应该是什么。该研究的结论是,需要进行进一步的研究,尤其是那些研究将学生送到天主教高中的父母的宗教动机的研究。

著录项

  • 作者

    Bueter, Robert J.;

  • 作者单位

    Union Institute and University.;

  • 授予单位 Union Institute and University.;
  • 学科 Education Religious.;Education Secondary.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 241 p.
  • 总页数 241
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号