首页> 外文学位 >Hegel's defense of moral responsibility.
【24h】

Hegel's defense of moral responsibility.

机译:黑格尔捍卫道德责任。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

According to Hegel, one defining characteristic of humankind is the capacity for responsibility or guilt (Schultz). Traditionally, philosophers have seen our practical or everyday understanding of moral responsibility as threatened by a theoretical view of the world as subject to causal determination. Hegel's defense of responsibility, however, is concerned not with the threat from determinism, but with reconciling two perspectives that occur within the practical or everyday view: internal avowals of intention (an agent's professed motives or reasons to act) and external judgments on action (like praise and blame). This is the "inner-outer" problem.;In this dissertation, I analyze the three incompatible concepts of moral responsibility implied by the Philosophy of Right: external responsibility, internal responsibility, and a third concept that posits "the identity of inner and outer." The first of these, external moral responsibility, extends blame to any wrong that expresses the agent's will at all. According to this concept, Oedipus can be blamed for patricide because he willingly killed the man who turned out to be his father; it is of no relevance that he did not kill his father knowingly or intentionally.;The second concept of responsibility is internal moral responsibility, which attempts to limit praise or blame to that aspect of the deed which the agent did intentionally. This concept implies a right of knowledge (Oedipus must have known what he was doing), a right of satisfaction (he must have wanted to do it) and a right of conscience (he must only be judged according to his knowledge of good and evil).;Against both of these, Hegel claims that we can only be blamed for our "buter" deeds insofar as they correspond to our "inner" intentions, but we can only know our intentions insofar as they manifest themselves externally in our deeds. I show how positing such an identity between inner and outer gives rise to what I term substantive responsibility. This, for Hegel, is full answerability to the concrete duties that attend any member of an actual ethical community.
机译:黑格尔认为,人类的一个定义性特征是承担责任或负罪感的能力(舒尔茨)。传统上,哲学家将我们对道德责任的实际或日常理解视为受到因果关系决定的世界理论观点的威胁。但是,黑格尔的辩护责任与确定性的威胁无关,而是与在实际或日常观点中出现的两种观点协调一致:意图的内部宣誓(代理人的自称动机或采取行动的理由)和对行为的外部判断(赞美和责备)。这就是“内外”问题。本文分析了权利哲学所隐含的三个道德责任概念:外部责任,内部责任和第三个以“内在和外在身份”为前提的概念。 。”首先,外部道德责任将责任归咎于任何表达代理人意愿的错误。根据这个概念,俄狄浦斯应该被谴责为杀人犯,因为他愿意杀死那个原来是他父亲的人。他没有故意或故意杀害父亲无关紧要。第二个责任概念是内部道德责任,它试图将称赞或责备仅限于代理人故意做到的那方面。这个概念意味着知识权(俄狄浦斯一定知道他在做什么),满足权(他一定想做)和良心权(他只能根据对善恶的判断来判断) ).;针对这两个方面,黑格尔声称,我们只能因我们的“过失”行为与我们的“内在”意图相对应而受到指责,但我们只能知道我们的意图,只要它们在我们的行为中从外部体现出来。我展示了在内部和外部之间建立这样的身份是如何引起我所谓的实质性责任的。对于黑格尔来说,这完全符合实际道德社区中任何成员的具体职责。

著录项

  • 作者

    Alznauer, Mark.;

  • 作者单位

    The University of Chicago.;

  • 授予单位 The University of Chicago.;
  • 学科 Philosophy.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 234 p.
  • 总页数 234
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 哲学理论 ;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号