首页> 外文学位 >The Petrarchian lyrical imperative: An anthropology of the sonnet in Renaissance France, 1536--1552.
【24h】

The Petrarchian lyrical imperative: An anthropology of the sonnet in Renaissance France, 1536--1552.

机译:Petrarchian抒情命令:法国文艺复兴时期十四行诗的人类学,1536--1552年。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

In an effort to "rehabilitate Lyric Studies" as suggested by Jonathan Culler in his January 2008 PMLA article "Why Lyric?", this dissertation seeks to explain the near-universal appeal of the constrained, fourteen-verse sonnet form since it was codified by Petrarch seven centuries ago in trecento Italy. Exploring the evolution of the structure and thematics of the verse form, while tracing its historical progression from its Sicilian origins under Giacomo da Lentini through Petrarch and into Renaissance France, my research proposes an anthropological model to explain the supremacy of the sonnet as the ideal lyrical form. Tapping into a tradition that seeks to understand literary genres in terms of the human (i.e. Andrew Lang, Edward B. Tylor, Sir James Frazer, Edith Hamilton, Northrop Frye, Eric Gans, and, most recently, Jonathan Culler) and considering various arts poetiques that seek to theorize the rhetorical functions of lyrical forms, I argue that the predominance of the sonnet can be understood in terms of the inter-relations between human desire, language and the sacred to which it is germane. More succinctly, the sonnet's ideal lyricism derives from: (1) its parsimonious and ritualistically-repeatable form; (2) its unique tension between symmetry and discontinuity, perpetual deferral and violent rupture; (3) its syllogistic validity; and, perhaps most importantly, (4) the fact that it functions linguistically in the imperative mode---recreating the fundamental speech act from which lyrical poetry emerges. In fact, the dissertation's title, The Petrarchian Lyrical Imperative, is multifaceted, referring both to an enduring esthetic compulsion---of imitating Petrarch---that transcends literary movements and historical periods as well as the subjective position of the lyrical poet, addressing a desired, but perpetually absent and ultimately unattainable, object. Testing this anthropological model against the sonnets of the first vogue of the form in Renaissance France, 1536-1552 (those of Marot, Saint-Gelais, Tyard, Ronsard, Baif, etc.), my analysis reveals an evolution in the French sonnet that allows me to divide its earliest manifestations into three separate---sociologically-determined---typologies, prior to suggesting further fields of study in the post-1552 avatars of the verse form in France.
机译:正如乔纳森·库勒(Jonathan Culler)在其2008年1月的PMLA文章“为什么要歌词”中所建议的那样,为了“恢复歌词研究”,本论文试图解释十四首十四行诗形式的受约束的近乎普遍的吸引力,因为十四行诗由七个世纪前的佩特拉克(意大利)。在探讨诗歌形式的结构和主题的演变的同时,追溯其从贾科莫·达·伦蒂尼(Giacomo da Lentini)的西西里起源到Petrarch直至法国文艺复兴时期的历史进程,我的研究提出了一种人类学模型来解释十四行诗作为理想抒情诗的至高地位。形成。运用一种试图从人的角度理解文学体裁的传统(例如,安德鲁·朗,爱德华·泰勒,詹姆斯·弗雷泽爵士,伊迪丝·汉密尔顿,诺斯罗普·弗莱,埃里克·甘斯,以及最近的乔纳森·卡勒),并考虑各种艺术寻求理论化抒情形式的修辞功能的诗歌,我认为十四行诗的优势可以从人类的欲望,语言和它的神圣性之间的相互关系来理解。更为简洁的是,十四行诗的理想抒情诗源于:(1)简约和礼节可重复的形式; (2)在对称性和不连续性,永久延期和剧烈破裂之间的独特张力; (三)三段论的有效性; (4)它以命令方式在语言上起作用的事实-重建了抒情诗的基础言语行为。实际上,论文的标题《彼得拉奇式抒情命令》是多方面的,既指持久的审美冲动(模仿彼得拉克),它超越了文学运动和历史时期以及抒情诗人的主观立场,一个理想的,但永久缺乏的,最终是无法实现的目标。对照法国文艺复兴时期(1536-1552年)的第一个时尚十四行诗(马洛特,圣热莱斯,塔德,罗纳德,拜夫等)的十四行诗测试了这种人类学模型,我的分析揭示了法国十四行诗的演变,让我将其最早的表现形式划分为三种独立的,由社会学确定的典型,然后在法国1552年以后的诗歌形式化身中提出进一步的研究领域。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hudson, Robert James.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Romance literature.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2008
  • 页码 341 p.
  • 总页数 341
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号