...
首页> 外文期刊>British journal for the history of science >Finding revelation in anthropology: Alexander Winchell, William Robertson Smith and the heretical imperative
【24h】

Finding revelation in anthropology: Alexander Winchell, William Robertson Smith and the heretical imperative

机译:寻找人类学的启示:亚历山大·温彻尔,威廉·罗伯逊·史密斯和异端的命令

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Anthropological inquiry has often been considered an agent of intellectual secularization. Not least is this so in the sphere of religion, where anthropological accounts have often been taken to represent the triumph of naturalism. This metanarrative, however, fails to recognize that naturalistic explanations could sometimes be espoused for religious purposes and in defence of confessional creeds. This essay examines two late nineteenth-century figures - Alexander Winchell in the United States and William Robertson Smith in Britain - who found in anthropological analysis resources to bolster rather than undermine faith. In both cases these individuals found themselves on the receiving end of ecclesiastical censure and were dismissed from their positions at church-governed institutions. But their motivation was to vindicate divine revelation, in Winchell's case from the physical anthropology of human origins and in Smith's from the cultural anthropology of Semitic ritual.
机译:人类学探究经常被认为是智力世俗化的推动力。在宗教领域尤其如此,在人类学领域,人类学常被视为代表自然主义的胜利。但是,这种叙事性叙述没有认识到有时出于宗教目的和为悔信条的辩护可能会采用自然主义的解释。本文研究了十九世纪末期的两个人物-美国的亚历山大·温彻尔和英国的威廉·罗伯逊·史密斯,他们在人类学分析中发现了支持而不是破坏信仰的资源。在这两种情况下,这些人都处于教会谴责的接受端,并被解职于教会管理的机构。但是他们的动机是为了证明神圣的启示,在温切尔的案例中,是人类起源的身体人类学,在史密斯的案例中,是来自闪族宗教的文化人类学。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号