首页> 外文学位 >Fatigue, self-efficacy, and physical functional status in persons with lung cancer.
【24h】

Fatigue, self-efficacy, and physical functional status in persons with lung cancer.

机译:肺癌患者的疲劳,自我效能和身体功能状态。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is a prevalent and severe symptom that is inadequately managed and accompanied by other unpleasant symptoms that negatively impact the physical functional status (PFS) of persons with cancer and especially those with lung cancer (LC). Symptom management occurs through self-directed action, with perceived self-efficacy (PSE) being a key factor. Existing theories and studies do not address the key role PSE plays in a person's ability to manage symptoms and improve their PFS, making the current study unique in persons with LC and other cancer (OC) diagnoses.; Secondary data analyses from baseline observation of two randomized control trials were performed on 63 persons with LC and 235 persons with OC diagnoses who were undergoing a course of chemotherapy. For the total sample and in the LC and OC groups separately, the hypothesis of mediation from CRF to PFS through PSE for fatigue management was tested showing significant support for partial mediation. In the total sample, the magnitude of the relationship between CRF and PFS was reduced after PSE for fatigue management was controlled, with the mediation accounting for 12% of the variance (t = -2.59; p = .009). Consequently, CRF severity directly influences PFS and indirectly influences PFS by its effect on PSE for fatigue management. Further, on a 0-10 scale (10 = most severe), similar levels of CRF severity were reported by persons with LC (M = 5.88; SD = 2.00) and OC (M = 5.83; SD = 2.29) diagnoses (t = -.161; df = 296; p = .872). However, through blockwise, hierarchical multiple regression, similar levels of CRF severity were found to significantly worsen the PFS of persons with LC as compared to OC diagnoses (t = -3.78). In addition to type of cancer diagnoses, five other factors in the total sample were identified through blockwise, multiple hierarchical regression as the most important factors accounting for 47.7% of the explained variance in PFS [F (28, 295) = 8.68, p = .000]. Specifically, higher levels of PSE for fatigue management (t = 3.55) were found to be one of the strongest predictors of greater PFS, while lower levels of PFS were predicted by greater total CRF severity (t = -5.39), greater number of co-morbid conditions (t = -4.20), greater total symptom severity (t = -2.46), and having surgery prior to chemotherapy (t = -2.31).; Lower levels of PSE for fatigue management were identified through best of all subset regression to be a predictor of greater CRF severity in the total sample and in the LC and OC groups. Persons with LC (M = 4.99; SD = 1.43) as compared to OC (M = 4.54; SD = 1.60) diagnoses reported higher levels of total severity of the other unpleasant symptoms (t = -1.99; df = 294; p = .047). Through path analyses, the CRF severity had a direct effect on increasing the total symptom severity of the other unpleasant symptoms (t = 9.69) which lowered the PFS (t = -2.71) for persons with LC and OC diagnoses.; The findings indicate that CRF is related to the presence of other symptoms, and PSE is an important factor in optimizing CRF management and PFS. This study provides the foundation for future intervention studies to increase PSE to achieve optimal symptom management and PFS in persons with cancer.
机译:癌症相关的疲劳(CRF)是一种普遍且严重的症状,管理不当,并伴有其他不良症状,这些症状会对癌症患者尤其是肺癌患者的身体功能状态(PFS)产生负面影响。症状管理是通过自我指导的行为进行的,而感知的自我效能感(PSE)是关键因素。现有的理论和研究并未解决PSE在人们控制症状和改善其PFS的能力中所起的关键作用,这使得当前的研究在LC和其他癌症(OC)诊断患者中独树一帜。根据两项随机对照试验的基线观察,对接受化疗的63位LC患者和235位OC诊断患者进行了二级数据分析。对于总样本以及分别在LC和OC组中,检验了通过PSE从CRF到PFS进行调解以进行疲劳管理的假设,显示了对部分调解的重要支持。在总样本中,控制了疲劳管理的PSE后,CRF和PFS之间的关系幅度减小了,调解占方差的12%(t = -2.59; p = .009)。因此,CRF严重性直接影响PFS,并通过其对PSE疲劳管理的影响间接影响PFS。此外,LC诊断(M = 5.88; SD = 2.00)和OC(M = 5.83; SD = 2.29)的患者在0-10评分(10 =最严重)上报告了相似的CRF严重程度(t = -.161; df = 296; p = .872)。但是,通过逐级分层多元回归,发现与OC诊断相比,相似水平的CRF严重程度显着恶化了LC患者的PFS(t = -3.78)。除癌症诊断类型外,还通过分块,多元层次回归将总样本中的其他五个因素确定为最重要的因素,占PFS解释方差的47.7%[F(28,295)= 8.68,p = .000]。具体而言,发现用于疲劳管理的PSE较高水平(t = 3.55)是较高PFS的最强预测指标之一,而较高的总CRF严重程度(t = -5.39)和较多co -病态(t = -4.20),总症状严重程度更高(t = -2.46),并且在化疗之前进行手术(t = -2.31)。通过所有子集回归中的最佳方法,可以确定较低的PSE疲劳管理水平可以预测总样本以及LC和OC组CRF严重程度较高。与OC(M = 4.54; SD = 1.60)相比,LC患者(M = 4.99; SD = 1.43)报告的其他不适症状的总严重程度更高(t = -1.99; df = 294; p =。 047)。通过路径分析,CRF严重程度直接影响了其他不愉快症状的总症状严重程度(t = 9.69),从而降低了LC和OC诊断者的PFS(t = -2.71)。研究结果表明,CRF与其他症状的存在有关,PSE是优化CRF管理和PFS的重要因素。这项研究为将来的干预研究提供了基础,以增加PSE以实现癌症患者的最佳症状管理和PFS。

著录项

  • 作者

    Hoffman, Amy Jude.;

  • 作者单位

    Michigan State University.;

  • 授予单位 Michigan State University.;
  • 学科 Health Sciences Nursing.; Health Sciences Oncology.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 2007
  • 页码 221 p.
  • 总页数 221
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 预防医学、卫生学;肿瘤学;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号