首页> 中文学位 >Comparative Study on Grammar Teaching——Cognitive and Communicative Approaches
【6h】

Comparative Study on Grammar Teaching——Cognitive and Communicative Approaches

代理获取

目录

文摘

英文文摘

Acknowledgements

Abbreviation

1Introduction

1.1General Introduction of the Study

1.2Need for the Study and Thesis Statement

1.2.1 Need for the Study

1.2.2 Thesis Statement

1.3Structure of the Thesis

2Literature Review

2.1Grammar Teaching in the West

2.1.1 Inthe 1960s

2.1.2 In the 1970s

2.1.3 In the 1980s

2.1.4 In Recent Years

2.2Grammar Teaching in China

3Comparison and Analysis

3.1Place of Grammar

3.1.1 Cognitive Approach

3.1.2 Communicative Approach

3.1.3 Analysis

3.2Syllabus Design

3.2.1 Cognitive Approach-Structural Syllabus

3.2.2 Communicative Approach-Communicative Syllabus

3.2.3 Analysis

3.3Psychological Presumptions

3.3.1 Cognitive Approach-Behaviorist

3.3.2 Communicative Approach-Mentalist

3.4Approach to Teaching

3.4.1 Way of Acquiring Meaning

3.4.2 Way of Presenting Grammatical Rules

3.4.3Analysis

3.5Classroom Organization

3.5.1 Cognitive Approach

3.5.2 Communicative Approach-Group Work

3.5.3 Analysis

3.6Teacher and Students' Roles

3.6.1 Cognitive Approach

3.6.2 Communicative Approach

3.7Assessment

3.7.1 Cognitive Approach-Structural Tests

3.7.2 Communicative Approach-Communicative Tests

4Discussion

4.1Design Principle Ⅰ: Explanation of grammatical rules should not beavoided

4.2Design Principle Ⅱ: Grammar teaching should attempt to make the syllabus both ‘notional ' and ‘structural'

4.3Design Principle Ⅲ: Teaching materials should derive from a description of discourse

4.4Design Principle Ⅳ: Grammar teaching should adopt some task-based activities

4.5Design Principle Ⅴ: Testing should be student self-assessment

5Conclusion

5.1Summary of the Comparative Study

5.2Recommendations and Suggestions for Future Study

5.3Limitation of Study

5.3.1 Limitation of the Sources

5.3.2 Limitation of Time

5.3.3 Limitation of Personal Capability

References

个人简历

研究成果及发表的学术论文

展开▼

摘要

语法教学一直是语言学家和语言教师争论的焦点,从语法要不要教到教什么,什么时候教以及如何教。本文对认知法与交际法这两种教学方法对语法教学的处理进行了详细的比较,目的是帮助语言教师充分认识语法教学,找到适合中国的语言环境及教学环境的语法教学的最佳途径,最终有效提高语法教学的效果。 本文通过比较研究,认为这两种教学方法均有可取及不足之处,并根据中国教学环境提出几点语法教学的课堂设计原则,如认知法语法教学中语法规则的讲解必不可少;而语法练习则应放在更多的交际活动中等。总之,本文认为中国的语法教学应采取一种折衷的教学方法,找出每种方法适合中国的方面并应用在语法教学中,从而达到理想的教学效果。

著录项

  • 作者

    何宇丹;

  • 作者单位

    沈阳师范大学;

  • 授予单位 沈阳师范大学;
  • 学科 外国语言学及应用语言学
  • 授予学位 硕士
  • 导师姓名 李云启;
  • 年度 2005
  • 页码
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 英文
  • 中图分类 英语;
  • 关键词

    英语教学; 认知法; 交际法; 语法教学;

相似文献

  • 中文文献
  • 外文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号