首页> 外文会议>World conference on nondestructive testing;WCNDT >The Comparison Test Between The Two NDT Methods Of Magnetic Couple And Touch Head On The Branch Pipe Angle Weld
【24h】

The Comparison Test Between The Two NDT Methods Of Magnetic Couple And Touch Head On The Branch Pipe Angle Weld

机译:支管角焊缝上磁耦合和接触头两种无损检测方法的比较试验

获取原文

摘要

The joint of main pipe and its branch pipe is often welded while the pipe is used to transport higher pressure medium , and do not use the tee joint . The nondestructive test methods for the welded joint we can use according to the field are magnetic couple and touch head . But which one is better to find out defects of the welded joint ? So , we designed a comparison test to compare the results of finding out defects of the welded joint. The comparison test was made between the two NDT methods of magnetic couple and touch head on the angle weld composed by main pipe (Ф219?á6)and its branch pipe(Ф159?á6),the meterials of the two pipes are L360 .And from the test,we get the conclusion that the length destingusied by C-15/50 test spiece along the weld length is equal or near the same,but the magnetic couple method is easier to practice.
机译:主管及其分支管的接头通常在管道用于输送高压介质时进行焊接,不使用三通接头。我们可以根据现场使用的焊接接头的无损检测方法是磁耦合和接触头。但是,哪一个更好地找出焊接接头的缺陷呢?因此,我们设计了一个比较测试,以比较发现焊接接头缺陷的结果。在主管(Ф219?á6)和支管(Ф159?á6)组成的角焊缝上,采用磁耦合和接触头这两种NDT方法进行了对比测试,两管的材质为L360。在试验中,我们得出的结论是,C-15 / 50试件沿焊接长度确定的长度相等或相近,但磁耦合方法更易于实践。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号