首页> 外文会议>World conference on nondestructive testing >The Comparison Test Between The Two NDT Methods Of Magnetic Couple And Touch Head On The Branch Pipe Angle Weld
【24h】

The Comparison Test Between The Two NDT Methods Of Magnetic Couple And Touch Head On The Branch Pipe Angle Weld

机译:两种NDT方法与分支管角焊接的两种NDT方法的比较试验

获取原文

摘要

The joint of main pipe and its branch pipe is often welded while the pipe is used to transport higher pressure medium , and do not use the tee joint . The nondestructive test methods for the welded joint we can use according to the field are magnetic couple and touch head . But which one is better to find out defects of the welded joint ? So , we designed a comparison test to compare the results of finding out defects of the welded joint. The comparison test was made between the two NDT methods of magnetic couple and touch head on the angle weld composed by main pipe (Ф219?á6)and its branch pipe(Ф159?á6),the meterials of the two pipes are L360 .And from the test,we get the conclusion that the length destingusied by C-15/50 test spiece along the weld length is equal or near the same,but the magnetic couple method is easier to practice.
机译:主管及其分支管的接头通常焊接,而管子用于运输更高的压力介质,并且不使用TEE接头。我们可以根据该领域使用的焊接接头的非破坏性测试方法是磁性耦合和触摸头。但哪一个更好地找到焊接关节的缺陷?因此,我们设计了比较测试,以比较发现焊接接头缺陷的结果。在由主管(Ф219'6)和其分支管组成的角焊接上的磁性夫妇和触摸头的两个NDT方法之间进行了比较测试(Ф159?Á6),两个管道的内容为L360。测试,我们得出结论:沿着焊接长度的C-15/50测试件的长度等于或接近相同,但磁性耦合方法更容易练习。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号