首页> 外文会议>World conference on earthquake engineering;WCEE >NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES - THE INFLUENCEOF MATERIAL MODELLING IN REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMESTRUCTURES
【24h】

NONLINEAR STATIC AND DYNAMIC ANALYSES - THE INFLUENCEOF MATERIAL MODELLING IN REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAMESTRUCTURES

机译:非线性静力和动力分析-钢筋混凝土框架结构中材料建模的影响

获取原文

摘要

There has been considerable research on modelling inelastic behaviour of reinforced concrete. However,nonlinear material models used for seismic response history analyses and for nonlinear static analysis(NSA) procedures tend to be simple. It can be argued that sophisticated material models for a complexmaterial like reinforced concrete are perhaps not essential for earthquake analysis in view of several otheruncertainties associated with the seismic phenomenon. This paper examines the influence of materialmodelling on RHA responses for a simple reinforced concrete frame structure. Five acceleration timehistories compatible to elastic design spectrum of Eurocode 8 are used for RHA. Two material models areconsidered: a concrete damaged plasticity model that uses the Drucker Prager criterion and in whichconcrete and reinforcement are modelled separately and a homogenized Drucker Prager model. In bothcases the influence of strain hardening and strain rate effects are considered. The results show that thedesign response from RHA analyses is significantly different for the two models. The paper then comparesthe NSA and RHA responses for the two material models for reinforced concrete. The NSA proceduresconsidered are the Displacement Coefficient Method (DCM) and the Capacity Spectrum Method (CSM).A comparison of RHA and NSA procedures shows that there can be a significant difference in localresponse even though the target deformation values at the control node match. Moreover, the differencebetween the mean peak RHA response and the pushover response is not independent of the materialmodel.
机译:在建模钢筋混凝土的非弹性行为方面已有大量研究。然而,用于地震反应历史分析和非线性静力分析(NSA)过程的非线性材料模型趋于简单。可以认为,鉴于与地震现象相关的其他一些不确定性,复杂材料(如钢筋混凝土)的复杂材料模型对于地震分析可能不是必需的。本文研究了材料模型对简单钢筋混凝土框架结构的RHA响应的影响。 RHA使用了与Eurocode 8的弹性设计范围兼容的五个加速时间历史。考虑了两种材料模型:使用Drucker Prager准则的混凝土受损可塑性模型,其中分别对混凝土和钢筋建模,以及均质的Drucker Prager模型。在两种情况下,都考虑了应变硬化和应变率效应的影响。结果表明,两种模型在RHA分析中的设计响应差异很大。然后,本文比较了两种钢筋混凝土材料模型的NSA和RHA响应。 NSA程序考虑的是位移系数法(DCM)和容量谱法(CSM)。RHA和NSA程序的比较表明,即使控制节点处的目标变形值匹配,局部响应也可能存在显着差异。而且,平均峰值RHA响应和推覆响应之间的差异并不独立于材料模型。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号