摘要

Online data backup services provide durable storage for user data without the hassle of traditional backup solutions, but comfort comes at a price. In this paper we focus on the costs of online data backup. First, we survey existing online backup pricing models: we compare unlimited and pro rata data plans, then we propose a novel, risk-based pricing scheme which suits risk-conscious users. Second, we build a simple Backup Selection Game where users can choose among these three cloud-based pricing schemes and the cost imposed by participating in a peerto- peer backup system. We show that rational users generally prefer the pro rata scheme, irrespective of the characteristics of individual users. On the other hand, heterogeneous equilibria may also emerge under certain distributions of data volume per user, due to the effect of buying storage in bulk. We also discuss how peer-to-peer backup could emerge under a more elaborate cost model.
机译:在线数据备份服务为用户数据提供了持久的存储,而没有传统备份解决方案的麻烦,但是舒适性是有代价的。在本文中,我们关注在线数据备份的成本。首先,我们调查现有的在线备份定价模型:比较无限制和按比例的数据计划,然后提出一种适合风险意识用户的新颖,基于风险的定价方案。其次,我们构建了一个简单的备份选择游戏,用户可以在这三种基于云的定价方案中以及参与对等备份系统带来的成本之间进行选择。我们表明,理性用户通常会偏爱按比例分配方案,而不考虑单个用户的特征。另一方面,由于批量购买存储的影响,在每个用户的数据量的某些分布下,异构均衡也可能出现。我们还将讨论在更精细的成本模型下如何实现对等备份。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号