首页> 外文会议>Visual Communications and Image Processing 2005 pt.4 >Model-based PDE method and model-free PDE method for motion de-blurring
【24h】

Model-based PDE method and model-free PDE method for motion de-blurring

机译:用于运动去模糊的基于模型的PDE方法和无模型的PDE方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Once image motion is accurately estimated, we can utilize those motion estimates for image sharpening and we can remove motion blurs. First, for the motion de-blurring, this paper presents a model-based PDE method that minimizes the regularized energy functional defined with a spatially variant model of motion blurs. Unlike the case of spatially invariant image blurs, the minimization of the energy functional cannot be achieved in a closed non-iterative way, and we derive its iterative algorithm. The standard regularization method uses a square function to measure energy of its solution function, and employs the energy functional composed of the data-fidelity energy term to measure a deviation of a solution function from the assumed model of motion blurs and the regularization energy term to impose smoothness constraints on a solution function. However, the standard variational method is not proper for the motion de-blurring, because it is sensitive to model errors, and occurrence of errors are inevitable in motion estimation. To improve the robustness against the model errors, we employ a nonlinear robust estimation function for measuring energy to be minimized. Secondly, this paper experimentally compares the model-based PDE method with our previously presented model-free PDE method that does not need any accurate blur model. In the model-error-free case the model-based PDE method outperforms the model-free PDE method, whereas in the model-error case the latter works better than the former.
机译:一旦准确估计了图像运动,我们就可以利用这些运动估计进行图像锐化,并且可以消除运动模糊。首先,对于运动去模糊,本文提出了一种基于模型的PDE方法,该方法最小化了运动模糊的空间变异模型所定义的正则化能量函数。与空间不变图像模糊的情况不同,不能以封闭的非迭代方式实现能量泛函的最小化,因此我们推导了其迭代算法。标准正则化方法使用平方函数来测量其解函数的能量,并采用由数据保真度能量项组成的能量函数来测量解函数与假设的运动模糊模型和正则化能量项之间的偏差。对求解函数施加平滑度约束。然而,标准变分方法不适用于运动去模糊,因为它对模型误差敏感,并且在运动估计中不可避免地会出现误差。为了提高针对模型误差的鲁棒性,我们采用了非线性鲁棒估计函数来测量要最小化的能量。其次,本文通过实验将基于模型的PDE方法与我们先前介绍的不需要模型的无模型PDE方法进行了比较。在无模型错误的情况下,基于模型的PDE方法要优于无模型PDE方法,而在模型错误的情况下,后者要比前一种方法更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号