【24h】

Why myopic policies persist? Impact of growth opportunities and competition

机译:为什么近视政策仍然存在?增长机会和竞争的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Several case studies have documented myopic allocation of organizational resources among capabilities that payoff in short vs. long-term. We capture a general class of organizational resource allocation problems in a simple model that exhibits the typical worse-before-better dynamics commonly believed to be responsible for persistence of myopic policies. Next we examine the endogeneity of resources and the impact of competitive pressures on the efficiency of allocation policies. Endogenous resources and competition are both shown to significantly shift the optimal allocation towards myopic policies. Short-term policies become beneficial as they strengthen the positive loop between performance, resources, and capabilities. In fact strategic selection of allocation policy in a competitive market can force the firms to allocate all the resources to the short-term capability. These results provide an alternative explanation for the persistence of myopic organizational decision-rules that does not rest on psychological and learning arguments.
机译:一些案例研究已经记录了在短期和长期回报之间的能力之间近视性组织资源分配。我们在一个简单的模型中捕获了通用的组织资源分配问题,该模型展示了通常被认为是近视策略持续存在的典型的先于后继的动态。接下来,我们研究资源的内生性以及竞争压力对分配政策效率的影响。内源性资源和竞争都显示出将最佳配置向近视政策大幅度转移。短期策略在增强性能,资源和功能之间的良性循环时变得非常有益。实际上,在竞争性市场中战略性地选择分配策略可以迫使企业将所有资源分配给短期能力。这些结果为近视组织决策规则的持久性提供了另一种解释,该规则不依赖于心理和学习论证。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号