首页> 外文会议>SI combustion, 2012. >Improvement in Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel Consumption and Cyclic Variability with Pulsed Energy Spark Plug
【24h】

Improvement in Spark-Ignition Engine Fuel Consumption and Cyclic Variability with Pulsed Energy Spark Plug

机译:脉冲能量火花塞改善了火花点火式发动机的燃油消耗和循环变异性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Conventional spark plugs ignite a fuel-air mixture via an electric-to-plasma energy transfer; the effectiveness of which can be described by an electric-to-plasma energy efficiency. Although conventional spark plug electric-to-plasma efficiencies have historically been viewed as adequate, it might be wondered how an increase in such an efficiency might translate (if at all) to improvements in the flame initiation period and eventual engine performance of a spark-ignition engine. A modification can be made to the spark plug that places a peaking capacitor in the path of the electrical current; upon coil energizing, the stored energy in the peaking capacitor substantially increases the energy delivered by the spark. A previous study has observed an improvement in the electric-to-plasma energy efficiency to around 50%, whereas the same study observed conventional spark plug electric-to-plasma energy efficiency to remain around 1%. It is postulated that improving this electric-to-plasma energy efficiency can result in improved 0-10% mass fraction burned duration and shorter 10% - 90% mass fraction burned duration. Perhaps by improving these aspects of combustion, engine fuel consumption and cycle-to-cycle variability can also be improved. This article provides a summary of engine and vehicle data comparing the "pulsed energy" spark plug to a conventional fine-wire iridium spark plug. Vehicle data are reported from a high-performance sports car on the European drive cycle; fuel economy improvements up to 1.2% are reported with the use of the pulsed energy spark plug. Engine data include brake specific fuel consumption, pre-catalyst exhaust concentrations of hydrocarbons, carbon monoxide, and oxides of nitrogen, and in-cylinder pressure-based calculations of mass fraction burned profiles. Over several steady-state engine operating speeds and loads including an idle condition, the pulsed energy plugs show a 1% improvement in brake specific fuel consumption. Over the same speeds and loads without the idle condition, the pulsed energy plugs show a 0.6% improvement in brake specific fuel consumption. The article provides analysis to this improvement, and suggests it results mostly from a sooner flame development (0-10% burn duration) and shorter 10-90% burn duration observed with the pulsed energy spark plugs.
机译:传统的火花塞通过电-等离子能量传递来点燃燃料-空气混合物。其有效性可以通过电等离子体能量效率来描述。尽管从历史上看,传统的火花塞电对等效率是足够的,但人们可能想知道,这种效率的提高如何(如果有的话)转化为火焰起爆周期的改善以及最终火花塞发动机的性能。点火发动机。可以对火花塞进行修改,在电流路径中放置一个峰值电容器。在线圈通电后,存储在峰值电容器中的能量将大大增加火花所传递的能量。先前的研究已经观察到电等离子体能量效率提高到大约50%,而同一项研究则观察到常规火花塞电等离子体能量效率保持在1%左右。据推测,改善这种电等离子体能量效率可导致0-10%的质量分数燃烧持续时间得到改善,并缩短10%-90%的质量分数燃烧持续时间。也许通过改善燃烧的这些方面,还可以改善发动机的燃油消耗和不同周期之间的差异。本文提供了发动机和车辆数据的摘要,将“脉冲能量”火花塞与常规细线铱合金火花塞进行了比较。车辆数据是根据欧洲行驶周期中的高性能跑车报告的;据报道,使用脉冲能量火花塞可将燃油经济性提高1.2%。发动机数据包括制动器的特定燃料消耗,碳氢化合物,一氧化碳和氮的氧化物的催化剂前排气浓度,以及基于缸内压力的燃烧质量分数分布的计算。在几种稳态发动机的运行速度和负载(包括怠速工况)下,脉冲式能量塞显示出制动比油耗降低了1%。在没有怠速工况的相同速度和负载下,脉冲式能量塞显示了0.6%的制动比油耗。这篇文章对这种改进进行了分析,并建议它主要是由脉冲能量火花塞观察到的更快的火焰发展(0-10%的燃烧持续时间)和较短的10-90%的燃烧持续时间导致的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号