【24h】

RETHINKING BUSINESS STRATEGY WITH COMPLEXITY THEORY

机译:用复杂性理论重新考虑业务战略

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Fairtlough (1995) concludes, "Our strategic thinking, and our organisational responses to changes in strategy, need the help of new mental models. ... that biology can be a fruitful source of mental models, of new conceptual schemes." Later on, Lissack (1997) proposes that complexity theory metaphors add value by allowing managers new ways of thinking and the use of a different language. He summarises, "complexity metaphors when accepted within the vocabulary of an organisation, can change both the way managers manage and the problems they choose to manage." Black (1962) explains metaphor is used, "to bring two separate domains into cognitive and emotional relation by using language directly appropriate to the one as a lens for seeing the other." The fact is that what we learnt from the industrial age could not help us to tackle the problem we encounter in the knowledge age. The classical economics theory cannot explain the phenomena. There is a new economy in the knowledge age. Arthur (1999) summaries that the new economy is created by the minds of its agents, namely, consumers, managers, and decision-makers. Instead of a physical economy, it is a cognitive one. Hence, we need a new mindset to meet the challenges ahead. In order to succeed in business strategy, we have to rethink the concept with complexity theory. Arthur (1996) concludes that, "strategy in the knowledge world requires CEOs to recognise that a different kind of economics is at work. CEOs needs to understand which positive and negative feedback mechanisms are at play in the market ecologies in which they compete." Berreby (1998) admits that, "the atmosphere of complexity work is of a construction site, not a completed building. ... No one can yet define complexity or say exactly how to manage a company in accordance with its principles." More researches on complexity theory is needed in future. However, complexity theory cannot tell us what to do in future. It can only help us to make a better sense of what is happening around us. Using a metaphor, we are all walking in the dark. Complexity theory is like a torch that can help us to have a better understanding around us so that we can find our way forward. However, it is only a tool. In the end, we still have to make our strategic decisions: Where are we? Where are we going? And, how can we get there?
机译:Fairtlough(1995)得出结论:“我们的战略思想以及我们对战略变化的组织反应,都需要新的心理模型的帮助。……生物学可以成为新概念方案的心理模型的丰硕成果。”后来,Lissack(1997)提出,复杂性理论隐喻通过允许管理者采用新的思维方式和使用另一种语言来增加价值。他总结道,“复杂隐喻在组织的词汇表中被接受时,既可以改变经理的管理方式,也可以改变他们选择管理的问题。”布莱克(Black)(1962)解释了隐喻的用法:“通过使用直接适合一个领域的语言作为看待另一个领域的镜头,将两个独立的领域带入认知和情感关系。”事实是,我们从工业时代中学到的知识无法帮助我们解决在知识时代遇到的问题。古典经济学理论无法解释这种现象。知识时代出现了新的经济。亚瑟(Arthur,1999)总结说,新经济是由它的代理商,即消费者,管理者和决策者的思想所创造的。它不是一种物理经济,而是一种认知经济。因此,我们需要一种新的思维方式来应对未来的挑战。为了在商业策略上取得成功,我们必须用复杂性理论重新思考这个概念。 Arthur(1996)得出以下结论:“知识世界中的战略要求CEO认识到另一种经济学正在起作用。CEO需要了解竞争中的市场生态中正反馈机制和负反馈机制在起作用。” Berreby(1998)承认,“复杂性工作的气氛是在建筑工地,而不是完整的建筑物。...还没有人能够定义复杂性或确切说出如何根据其原则来管理公司。”未来需要对复杂性理论进行更多的研究。但是,复杂性理论无法告诉我们将来该怎么做。它只能帮助我们更好地了解周围发生的事情。使用一个隐喻,我们都在黑暗中行走。复杂性理论就像是一个火炬,可以帮助我们更好地了解自己,以便我们找到前进的道路。但是,它只是一个工具。最后,我们仍然必须做出战略决策:我们在哪里?我们去哪?而且,我们如何到达那里?

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号