首页> 外文会议>Science and technology to promote harmonized production >OPTION CONTRACT AND CAPACITY RESERVATON CONTRACT IN A SUPPLY CHAIN
【24h】

OPTION CONTRACT AND CAPACITY RESERVATON CONTRACT IN A SUPPLY CHAIN

机译:供应链中的期权合同和容量保留合同

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This paper compares the performance in asupply chain for two type of contracts;option and capacity reservaaion.Inthis work we consider a dyadic supply chain formed by one retailer and one supplier, and we compare the performances for both companies and for the whole chain as a single unit under two gypes of contracts:option and capacity reservation.An option contract is one where the retailer orders a quantity of nuits and has a right to modify his order in any sense (it may be bigger or smaller than the initial order) without restrictions by buying the option premium in advance from the supplier.With a capacity reservation contract, the retailer reserver a number of units from the supplier and, after receiving more information about demand,he decides his final order.The main difference between both contracts is that with an option contract the retailer pays for the righut of changing his order, and with c capacity reservation contract the retailer pays in advance for the right to buy up to a fixde quantity.Fist the theoretical bases are introduced for each contract,next both conrracts are compared and finally the conclusions are presented.
机译:本文比较了两种类型的合同在供应链中的绩效;期权和容量储备。在这项工作中,我们考虑了由一个零售商和一个供应商组成的二元供应链,并比较了两家公司和整个链的绩效。两种合同形式下的单一单位:选择权和容量保留。选择权合同是零售商订购一定数量的产品,并有权在任何意义上修改其定单(它可能大于或小于初始定单)的权利。通过事先从供应商那里购买期权费来限制销售。通过容量保留合同,零售商从供应商那里储备了许多商品,在收到有关需求的更多信息之后,他决定了他的最终订单。这两个合同之间的主要区别是拥有选择权合同的零售商需要支付更改订单的费用,而拥有容量订购合同的零售商需要提前支付购买权首先介绍了每笔合约的理论基础,然后比较了两者的局限性,最后提出了结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号