首页> 外文会议>Research and Applications in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation >A comparison of the variable strut inclination and alternative stirrup design methods
【24h】

A comparison of the variable strut inclination and alternative stirrup design methods

机译:可变支撑杆倾斜度和替代箍筋设计方法的比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

South Africa’s adoption of EN 1992-1-1 Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures – Part 1-1:rnGeneral rules and rules for buildings will introduce theVariable Strut Inclination Method (VSIM) as an alternativernanalogy for stirrup design. The unbiased stirrup contribution of the EN 1992-1-1 VSIM has been shown to yieldrnunsafe capacity predictions for relatively heavily shear-reinforced concretebeams. Conversely, the same modelrnis excessively conservative for lightly reinforced beams. This contribution compares the performance of the ENrn1992-1-1 VSIM to (1) the classical Ritter-M?rsch stirrup design analogy employed in the currently operationalrnlocal design standard SANS 10100-1The structural use of concrete, and (2) the fib Model Code 2010 ModifiedrnCompression Field Theory (MCFT)-based design analogies (Levels of Approximation I & III). TheVSIM seemsrnto be in general agreement with the other design methods, but tends to offer higher capacity predictions at stirruprnamounts in excess of 1MPa.
机译:南非采用EN 1992-1-1欧洲规范2:混凝土结构设计–第1-1部分:建筑物的一般规则和规则将引入可变支柱倾斜法(VSIM)作为箍筋设计的替代方法。事实证明,EN 1992-1-1 VSIM的无偏箍筋贡献对剪切强度较大的混凝土梁产生了不安全的承载力预测。相反,同一模型对于轻度加强的梁过于保守。该贡献将ENrn1992-1-1 VSIM的性能与(1)当前正在使用的本地设计标准SANS 10100-1中采用的经典Ritter-Mrrsch箍筋设计类比进行了比较,混凝土的结构用途以及(2)fib模型基于Code 2010 Modifiedrn压缩场理论(MCFT)的设计类比(近似值I和III)。 VSIM似乎与其他设计方法大体一致,但是在马力超过1MPa时,往往会提供更高的容量预测。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号