首页> 外文会议>Reliability engineering and risk management. >Reliability-based Strength Factors for the Geotechnical Design of Foundations
【24h】

Reliability-based Strength Factors for the Geotechnical Design of Foundations

机译:地基岩土工程设计中基于可靠性的强度因子

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most current standards for designing structures and foundations prescribe the Load and Resistance Factor Design where strength factors reduce nominal capacities on account of uncertainties in material and geometrical properties and inaccuracies in procedures to estimate nominal capacities. This paper examines reliability-based derivation of strength factors for the geotechnical capacity of foundations using data from full scale load tests developed by EPRI and other sources. We consider the use of single and multiple strength factors for designing drilled shafts, direct embedded foundations, and shallow footings, placed in soil and/or rock. Studied types of loading are uplift, compression, and flexural and twisting moments. Design procedures are assessed based on their bias and coefficient of variation when compared to full scale load tests. A Bayesian approach is suggested to incorporate judgment for cases with limited a-mount of test data. In addition to standard design procedures, we consider methods recently formulated by the authors for drilled shafts. In particular, we consider FAD Tools, a computer system recently developed by DiGioia, Gray & Associates, LLC and released by EPRI, for designing drilled shafts and direct embedded foundations for single poles and H-Frames. Strength factors are recommended for these and other types of foundations studied by the authors and statistical parameters of the full-scale test data are provided. Finally, we illustrate the impact of different options on the size of foundations under representative prescribed loads.
机译:当前设计结构和基础的最新标准规定了荷载和阻力系数设计,其中强度系数由于材料和几何特性的不确定性以及估算公称力的程序不准确而降低了公称力。本文使用由EPRI和其他来源开发的全面荷载试验的数据,检验了基于强度的基础岩土工程能力强度因子的推导。我们考虑使用单个和多个强度系数来设计放置在土壤和/或岩石中的钻探井筒,直接埋入式基础和浅基础。所研究的载荷类型为举升,压缩以及挠曲和扭曲力矩。与全尺寸负载测试相比,设计程序会根据其偏差和变异系数进行评估。建议使用贝叶斯方法来合并对测试数据量有限的案例的判断。除了标准的设计程序,我们还考虑了作者最近为钻杆制定的方法。特别是,我们考虑FAD Tools,这是由DiGioia,Gray&Associates,LLC最近开发,由EPRI发布的计算机系统,用于设计单刀杆和H型机架的钻杆和直接埋入式基础。建议作者研究这些和其他类型基础的强度因子,并提供全面测试数据的统计参数。最后,我们说明了在具有代表性的规定荷载下,不同方案对地基尺寸的影响。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号