首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the First International Symposium on Geotechnical Safety Risk(ISGSR2007) >LRFD Code Development for Foundation Structures in Korea- Reliability Analysis of Static Bearing Capacity Evaluation of Driven Steel Pipe Piles
【24h】

LRFD Code Development for Foundation Structures in Korea- Reliability Analysis of Static Bearing Capacity Evaluation of Driven Steel Pipe Piles

机译:韩国基础结构的LRFD代码开发-钢管桩静载承载力评估的可靠性分析

获取原文

摘要

Reliability analyses of the static bearing capacity analysis methods for driven steel pipe piles adopted in the Korean Standards for Foundation Structures have been performed as part of the efforts to develop the Load and Resistance Factor Design Code for foundation structures in Korea. Over 2,000 static load test data on driven steel pipe piles were collected from all around the country. After review of the load-displacement curves, subsurface investigation reports, and other related documents, only 43 load test data were found to be useful for the reliability analysis. These load test piles were sorted into two cases: pile tip on soil case and pile tip on rock case. Resistance bias factor statistics of each pile tip case were evaluated for the two static design methods. Reliability analysis was performed by two types of First Order Reliability Methods, Mean Value First Order Second (MVFOSM) method and Advanced First Order Second (AFOSM) method. AFOSM method resulted in a little larger reliability indices than MVFOSM method, but the difference was not significant.
机译:作为制定韩国基础结构荷载和阻力因子设计规范的一部分,已经对韩国基础结构标准中采用的从动钢管桩的静态承载力分析方法进行了可靠性分析。从全国各地收集了2,000多个有关驱动钢管桩的静载荷测试数据。在审查了载荷-位移曲线,地下调查报告和其他相关文件后,仅发现了43个载荷测试数据可用于可靠性分析。这些载荷试验桩分为两种情况:土桩上的桩尖和岩箱上的桩尖。针对两种静态设计方法,评估了每种桩尖情况下的阻力偏倚系数统计。可靠性分析通过两种类型的一阶可靠性方法进行,即平均值一阶第二方法(MVFOSM)和高级一阶第二方法(AFOSM)。 AFOSM方法产生的可靠性指标比MVFOSM方法稍大,但差异不明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号