首页> 外文会议>Proceedings of the eleventh Americas conference on information systems (AMCIS 2005) >Information Technology and Bureaucratic Reform:A Case from India
【24h】

Information Technology and Bureaucratic Reform:A Case from India

机译:信息技术与官僚改革:以印度为例

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Most governments see the use of information systems as part of a reform strategy to reconfigure relations both among variousrngovernment departments as well as between governments and other stakeholders. However, there is little empirical evidencernto support whether these systems achieve this intended outcome. Therefore, the overarching question that guides this studyrncan be articulated as follows: given that the information systems used by governments are proposed to institute new relationalrnpatterns within governments and between governments and other stakeholders, has this happened, if it so how and if not whyrnnot. I suggest that e-governance systems are designed and implemented with the context of existing institutionalized socialrnstructures, which constrain actors who come together to build and implement a new system. However, this does not mean thatrnthese actors are mere puppets. They are capable of strategic action and can choose whether to reinforce the existingrninstitutionalized set up or to change it. In either case, these constrained actors build coalitions by using strategic andrnassumptive frames in their attempt to move from interpretive flexibility towards institutionalization. This study uses thernextended case study approach with in-depth interviews and participant observation as the data elicitation techniques. My datarnanalytic approach stems from the notion of a hermeneutic circle that sees the process of social construction andrninstitutionalization as a series of constructed dialogues.
机译:大多数政府将信息系统的使用视为改革策略的一部分,以重新配置政府各个部门之间以及政府与其他利益相关者之间的关系。但是,几乎没有经验证据来支持这些系统是否达到了预期的结果。因此,指导本研究的总体问题可以明确表达如下:鉴于提议政府使用的信息系统来在政府内部以及政府与其他利益相关者之间建立新的关系模式,这种情况是否发生了,如果是这样的话,那么是怎么回事呢?我建议电子政务系统是在现有的制度化社会结构的背景下设计和实施的,这会约束那些共同建立和实施新系统的参与者。但是,这并不意味着这些演员只是p。他们有能力采取战略行动,可以选择是加强现有的制度化设置还是对其进行更改。无论哪种情况,这些受约束的参与者都通过使用战略性和假设性框架来建立联盟,以试图从解释性灵活性转向制度化。本研究采用扩展的案例研究方法,通过深入访谈和参与者观察作为数据启发技术。我的数据分析方法源于诠释学的概念,该学说将社会建构和制度化的过程视为一系列构建的对话。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号