【24h】

Comments on the computer science/computer center interface

机译:关于计算机科学/计算机中心界面的评论

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

I'd like to find out how many people in this group come from institutions of 4000 or more students. How many of you come from institutions of 2500 or less? How many come from institutions of 1000 or less students? How many of you have your own computer? Are there any of you who don't have your own computer on campus? Of those who don't have their own computer on campus, how many are using some kind of real-time system or shared system of some sort? So everyone in here is in some way already in the computer racket. Now let me get one more pair of questions and then break off from this kind of audience participation. How many of you come from institutions where your computer is used almost---not necessarily altogether, but almost---exclusively for administrative purposes? Are there any people here whose computer is used altogether for instructional or educational purposes? Okay, that gives me a good idea of where things stand. It's really quite a broad spectrum of interests and backgrounds, as one might expect. Meetings of this kind frequently announce that they are appealing to small colleges, but because small colleges can't afford to come, the medium-size colleges, who think they're small anyway because they look at their budgets and realize what they'd like them to be, are the people who make up the group. I'm pleased to see the broad spectrum of interest.

rn

There were a good many comments earlier about curriculum. I come to you in a sense from the American Society of Information Science, a group with which I've had a good bit of involvement, and it is currently espousing a new curriculum look, inspired in part by "Curriculum '68." In the American Society for Information Science we would make the claim---incidentally, I should preface this perhaps, with Harris's charge to me to produce some nice, controversial comments and bait you into a great deal of response---that information science is the basic routine, and computer science is a facet of it. This is also true of library science and several other fields which are quite different. All these have a common interface in an area which might be called information science, and as such, the American Society for Information Science recognizes that curriculum efforts so far have all been so computer oriented, so specifically use-of-computer oriented, that they've decided to explore the possibilities of some more curriculum material. One of the interesting things to me is that your comments this morning led me to realize that there has been no consideration built into this plan, per se, for the smaller schools. I think that's a big mistake, and I intend to try to see that something is done about it. I don't know how far this might be carried.

机译:

我想找出这一组中有多少人来自4000名或更多学生的机构。你们中有多少人来自2500个或更少的机构?有多少来自1000名或以下学生的机构?你们中有多少人拥有自己的计算机?你们当中有没有在校园里没有电脑的人吗?在那些没有自己的计算机的校园中,有多少人正在使用某种实时系统或某种共享系统?因此,这里的每个人都已经以某种方式进入了计算机球拍。现在让我再提出两个问题,然后从这种观众参与中解脱。你们中有多少人几乎是-不一定是全部使用,而是几乎--仅出于管理目的而使用计算机的机构?这里是否有人将计算机完全用于教学或教育目的?好的,这使我对事情的立场有了一个很好的了解。正如人们可能期望的那样,这确实是广泛的兴趣和背景。这种会议经常宣布它们吸引小型学院,但是由于小型学院买不起,所以中等规模的大学认为他们还是小型的,因为他们查看预算并意识到自己的目标。像他们一样,是组成小组的人。我很高兴看到人们的广泛兴趣。 rn

前面有很多关于课程的评论。从某种意义上说,我来自美国信息科学学会,这个团体与我有很多参与,并且它正在倡导一种新的课程外观,其部分灵感来自“ 68课程”。在美国信息科学学会,我们会提出这样的主张-顺便说一句,也许我应该以哈里斯(Harris)对我的指控为由,提出一些有争议的评论并诱使您做出很多回应--信息科学是基本例程,而计算机科学是它的一个方面。图书馆学和其他几个完全不同的领域也是如此。所有这些在一个可以称为信息科学的领域中都有一个通用的界面,因此,美国信息科学学会认识到,到目前为止,课程设置都是以计算机为导向的,特别是以计算机使用为导向的,已经决定探索更多课程材料的可能性。对我来说有趣的事情之一是,您今天早上的评论使我意识到,对于规模较小的学校,该计划本身并没有考虑本身。我认为这是一个大错误,我打算尝试对此做一些事情。我不知道这可能会进行多远。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号