首页> 外文会议>Ninth Brazilian Symposium on Collaborative Systems. >Comparing Knowledge Codification Approaches: An Empirical Study
【24h】

Comparing Knowledge Codification Approaches: An Empirical Study

机译:知识编纂方法比较:一项实证研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The knowledge acquired by the members of a software organization is one of its most important assets. Therefore, the proper management of this knowledge has become a real need in the software development industry. One of the approaches to encourage knowledge transfer is its adequate formalization. This method can facilitate knowledge learning and usage. However, knowledge formalization is not trivial and there are several related strategies. This paper presents a qualitative study, in which we compared two knowledge codification support strategies: ABC-Pattern and Mind Map. The results indicate that the participants had a preference in using the ABC-Pattern approach due to its usage and utility. We identified some of the reasons for this preference: a) more codification detail, b) a more detailed description of the knowledgeâs scenario which is more clarifying, c) the possibility of acquiring more information with less effort, and d) the possibility of describing both the problem and the solution.
机译:软件组织成员获得的知识是其最重要的资产之一。因此,对这些知识的正确管理已成为软件开发行业中的真正需求。鼓励知识转移的方法之一是适当的形式化。这种方法可以促进知识的学习和使用。但是,知识形式化并非易事,并且有几种相关策略。本文提出了一个定性研究,我们比较了两种知识编码支持策略:ABC模式和思维导图。结果表明,由于其使用和效用,参与者倾向于使用ABC模式。我们确定了这种偏好的一些原因:a)更详细的编纂细节,b)对知识情景的更详细描述,这更加明确了,c)有可能用更少的精力获取更多信息,以及d)描述的可能性问题和解决方案。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号