【24h】

On Factive Islands: Pragmatic Anomaly vs. Pragmatic Infelicity

机译:在活动岛上:实用异常与实用不诚实

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Certain types of wh-phrases (e.g. how, why) cannot be extracted from the complement clause of a factive predicate, nor can they occur in situ within it (the factive island effect). This paper argues that the factive island effect is a pragmatic phenomenon, which follows from two independent factors: (ⅰ) the speaker's expectation about possible answers of wh-interrogatives, and (ⅱ) presuppositions induced by factive predicates. The proposed account illustrates a special kind of pragmatic infelicity (which I term "pragmatic anomaly"), which can be opposed to "contingent" pragmatic infelicity such as presupposition failure, violation of Gricean maxims, etc.
机译:某些类型的短语(例如如何,为什么)不能从一个事实谓词的补语子句中提取出来,也不能在它内部就地发生(事实岛效应)。本文认为,人为岛效应是一种务实的现象,它来自两个独立的因素:(ⅰ)说话人对wh疑问句可能答案的期望,以及(ⅱ)人为谓词引起的预设。拟议的说明说明了一种特殊的语用不熟练(我称其为“语用异常”),它可以与“或有”的语用不熟练相对,例如预设失败,违反Gricean准则等。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号