首页> 外文会议>NATO Advanced Research Workshop on the Utilization of Bioremediation to Reduce Soil Contamination: Problems and Solutions Jun 14-19, 2000 Prague, Czech Republic >FROM LABORATORY TO INDUSTRIAL SCALE: COMPOSTING OF POLLUTED SOILS FROM FORMER COAL INDUSTRY AND GAS PLANTS: FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS
【24h】

FROM LABORATORY TO INDUSTRIAL SCALE: COMPOSTING OF POLLUTED SOILS FROM FORMER COAL INDUSTRY AND GAS PLANTS: FUTURE RESEARCH NEEDS

机译:从实验室到工业规模:前煤炭工业和煤气厂污染土壤的组成:未来研究的需要

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Activities related to coking and, more generally, to transformation of coal, have been quite varied and underwent an intense evolution from the 18th to the 20th century. The pollutants which are likely to be present in the soils at these sites depend on the type of products being made at the site, the technical knowledge at the time of production, and the environmental policy of the company. More than thirty techniques of treatment of polluted soil from similar sites have been described and summarized in reviews published on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) The various treatment techniques can be classified into three main categories according to their action on the pollutants: 1. chemical or physical immobilization 2. extraction from the soil matrix 3. destruction Some of these techniques can be applied in situ or after excavation (ex situ). After excavation, the polluted material can be treated on site in a confined area, or be transported off site to a center specialized in the selected technique. The environmental risk and the financial cost inherent in transport made in situ and on-site treatments often advantageous. However, the application of this type of treatment is often severely limited, in particular by the nature of the soil matrix and of the contaminants. Destructive techniques consist mainly of various thermal treatments and biore-mediation. Biological techniques are generally less expensive than the thermal treatments and have the further advantage of a positive "green image" for the general public. Bioremediation techniques do not modify the intrinsic nature of the soil, and thus revegetation can be considered after treatment. It is thus not surprising that these techniques are receiving much attention.
机译:从18世纪到20世纪,与炼焦有关的活动(更广泛地说与煤的转化有关)的活动种类繁多,经历了激烈的演变。这些地点的土壤中可能存在的污染物取决于该地点生产的产品的类型,生产时的技术知识以及公司的环境政策。在代表环境保护署(EPA)发表的评论中,已经描述并总结了三十多种处理来自相似地点的污染土壤的技术。根据其对污染物的作用,各种处理技术可分为三大类:1 。化学或物理固定化2.从土壤基质中提取3.破坏这些技术中的一些可以在原地或在开挖后(非原地)应用。开挖后,被污染的材料可以在密闭区域内进行现场处理,也可以异地运输到专门从事所选技术的中心。原位和现场处理的运输固有的环境风险和财务成本通常是有利的。但是,这种处理的应用通常受到严格的限制,特别是由于土壤基质和污染物的性质。破坏性技术主要包括各种热处理和生物修复。生物技术通常比热处理便宜,并且具有对普通公众正面的“绿色形象”的进一步优势。生物修复技术不会改变土壤的固有性质,因此可以在处理后考虑植被恢复。因此,毫不奇怪,这些技术受到了广泛关注。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号